Asking about something unreal, does not turn it into something real

Everything in the world – whether it appears to be so-called spiritual or not – can be compared to a radio. Whatever a radio seems to send out into it is not produced by it. It just broadcast what it receives. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

You cannot cut your head off and see what you are thinking, because there are no thoughts of yours there. The animation is grabbed from Ello.

That I never think does not mean, there are no thoughts. There are lots of them. But they are not mine – just like the songs coming out of a radio does not belong to it.

Every appearance, whether it is perceived to be so-called spiritual or mundane, can be compared to a radio. There is nobody inside, that produces what seems to come out of it.

There is nobody inside a radio. It simply repeat what it receives. The same applies to Alexius – and what appears to be you, though it may not be your experience. In the context of the radio metaphor you probably assume, you are inside the radio, and that it is you who broadcast what is coming out of it. That is why, you never feel complete, because there is nobody there.

No matter what songs are coming out of a radio, the singer of the songs is not inside of it – neither is the singer singing the songs now. That was done long time ago.

A broadcast like this one may produce a broadcast from another radio saying, ´who is making the signals that the radio receives´. For those looking to be somebody definitive, a questions like this seems to imply, there is a self to be found somewhere. But broadcasting for example a sentence like ´is there life on the Moon?´, does not prove there is life on the moon.

To make long short, there is no meaning to be found in any broadcast, neither Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings. If there were, a world where there seems to be more than one would be meaningful. And how can it be meaningful, when there is no more than that which is one.


NOTE: This is article is part of hack #1.3 Thoughts are nothing.

Trackbacks

  1. […] We are really ´receivers´ floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram. […]

  2. […] consed ut a vit que peliquis uta con re pos es quam, qui cone nimaioria quid quidelique prem a am volore voluptame volores in ea voleces volor susantor anima illaborunt ipid quiam in commo molo te excessus et mo […]

  3. […] articles: Asking about something, doesn´t turn it into something real If you´re really here and now, you wouldn´t be ´here´ in this world of ghostly images Eyes […]

  4. […] is needed To be in the world and not of it What is freedom? You ain´t going nowhere Far from home Asking about something, doesn´t turn it into something real If you´re really here and now, you wouldn´t be ´here´ in this world of ghostly images It´s not […]

  5. […] No forgiveness is needed To be in the world and not of it Effortlessly living What is freedom? Asking about something, doesn´t turn it into something real You´re not your body, thoughts and actions – but that what makes them possible I am the […]

  6. […] is needed To be in the world and not of it What is freedom? You ain´t going nowhere Far from home Asking about something, doesn´t turn it into something real If you´re really here and now, you wouldn´t be ´here´ in this world of ghostly images It´s not […]

  7. […] thoughts coming from the sensors in the cloud – and so are you. You can however choose where in the cloud you channel thoughts from. And most importantly you can choose how to perceive the […]

  8. […] The wise one, who have heard gurus ask stupid questions like ´who are you?´, may ask, so who is it that read this article. If you could answer that, the interpretation of the meaningless frequencies would be real and not a fabrication. And that is why they ask questions like that. They want to be real, but they are not, and so there is no answer to questions like that. […]

  9. […] We are really ´receivers´ floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram. […]

  10. […] We are really ´receivers´ floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram. […]

  11. […] The wise one, who have heard gurus ask silly questions like ´who are you?´, may ask, so who is it that read this article. If you can answer that, the interpretation of the meaningless frequencies is real and not a fabrication. And that is why they ask questions like that. They want to be real, but they are not – and therefore there is no answer to questions like that. […]

  12. […] Be aware, that the above is not meant to be the ultimate explanation about a world where there seems to be more than one, neither is it meant to be correct, because nothing can explain why you believe to be someone definitive in a such a world, since that is not possible, as that which is you is no different from the formlessness of that which is one and it takes more than one to believe, you are someone definitive. See also No answers to existential questions and Asking about something unreal, does not turn it into something real. […]

  13. […] ****) See also No answers to existential questions and Asking about something unreal, does not turn it into something real. […]

  14. […] ****) See also No answers to existential questions and Asking about something unreal, does not turn it into something real. […]

  15. […] We are really ´receivers´ floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram. […]