No change is needed to come back to that which is one [in the process of being updated]

You see nobody else than yourself, and you are always talking with yourself.

There is no more than the formlessness of that which is one since formlessness is endless. That is why you must always talk with yourself to uphold the belief in being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

»You can’t go a minute without talking to yourself. It takes an incredible act of will not to talk to yourself.« Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky, who is considered to be a great contemporary thinker, claims that we spent 99.9 per cent of the time talking to ourselves internally. If this is the correct figure does not matter, because whether your communication is perceived to be internally or externally, you never talk with anybody but yourself.

Ears cannot hear, eyes do not see, the nose does not smell anything, and the body feels nothing. Read more about that here. The world that you think you hear, see, smell and feel is just that, namely thoughts compiled from what the brain imagines it receives from the sensory organs in the body it envisions to be within, so it seems to be someone who experiences to be in a material body that senses a tangible world outside of itself. See also Where to find the bliss of ´the empty breath´.

In other words, since what and where you believe in being is a fantasy of the brain, it needs to be nurtured by you talking with it always. If not doing that, you cease to appear as if you are someone inside a substantial body. That is why »it takes an incredible act of will not to talk to yourself,« as Noam Chomsky says.

Fortunately, you do not need to stop talking to undo the fantasy of being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one and return to the reality of that which is one. All you need is to change the purpose of talking, so it does not confirm a world where there seems to be more than one but that which is one.

Suppose you do not try to comply with the experiences you have of being in a world where there seems to be more than one, but perceive them as symbols of that which makes it possible to have this adventure, namely oneness. In that case, your talking does not establish you as someone in a world where there seems to be more than one but a symbol of that which is one. And since oneness is formless and therefore without beginning and end, what you symbolise has always been and always will be.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #2.1 Everything experienced is a symbol of life.

Trackbacks

  1. […] takes two to become one As Noam Chomsky suggest, there is always a dialogue going on. It may seem to be outside or inside with a voice from a person you know or from something […]

  2. […] one As Noam Chomsky claims, there is always an inner dialogue going on – see the article No talking is needed to come back to that which is one. But if everything is included, regardless the dialogue appears to be inside or outside of what […]

  3. […] one As Noam Chomsky claims, there is always an inner dialogue going on – see the article No talking is needed to come back to that which is one. But if everything is included, regardless the dialogue appears to be inside or outside of what […]

  4. […] Judgements about somebody being wrong justifies feeling angry. And judging somebody to be special justifies feeling joy. It also makes it look, as if it is the world that defines you to be someone definitive. The same applies, if you share specific thoughts and/or feelings with others in a dialogue that appears to be inside or outside yourself. Read more about this here. […]

  5. […] wherefore you contrary to the basic self have a constant inner dialogue of what to do – read more about having a constant the inner dialogue here. Since that is very tiring, you are constantly in need of more energy and relaxation. Read more […]

  6. […] a constant conversation is going on inside itself with another person imagined to be there – read more about that here – so that the special self feels entertained from […]

  7. […] a constant conversation is going on inside itself with another person imagined to be there – read more about that here – so that the special self feels entertained from […]

  8. […] But as most have replaced the basic self with a special one, they never forget to affirm the experience of themselves as special by having an ongoing conversation inside themselves with one or more, who they judge to be separated from them. See also No talking is needed to come back to that which is one. […]

  9. […] special perception of the world made by the brain appears to have an ongoing talk with each other (read more about that here). Both ways seem to confirm there is more than one and that oneness, therefore, is an […]

  10. […] The brain needs to be in a feedback loop to uphold the illusion of a world where there seems to be more than one. If not it goes into a coma after 20 minutes, 45 at most. And as that is the end of such a world, you need to make a feedback loop yourself, if your perception is out of sync with the script of the brain. That is why those who appear to be in the perception of your special world seem to have an ongoing internal talk with you. Read more about that here. […]

  11. […] because going with the flow of them, duality does not have to be ratified through an inner talk (read more about that here), so thoughts are reduced to insignificant jabber in the background (read more about that here). […]