The world is nothing but make-believe

Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg talks about virtual reality.

»Suddenly, you´re on the roof of a skyscraper, looking down on the city below. The roof is tiny and you’re close to the edge and a sense of vertigo sets in. You feel the need to step back before you fall. But the edge isn’t really there.

You’re really at Facebook’s annual developer conference, and there’s an Oculus headset strapped to your face. The city and its skyscraper are part of an Oculus virtual reality demo that Facebook is sharing with conference attendees … But there’s another thing you notice while standing atop that virtual skyscraper. As you look down, you realise you can’t see your own feet. You’re completely disembodied.« From an article in Wired.

PART 1:
Being a virtual reality game makes one nauseous. The body is tricked to believe it is moving and that there are things outside of it, that is not there. Though you are totally separated from the world, you are not in the virtual world of the game, even though it appears you must do things there in order to survive. In fact, you are sitting in a chair with your eyes covered by a set of goggles. An app fills it with a simulated world, that due to your response to it seems to create feelings in you, as is you are in a real world.

Getting lost in a virtual world.The world of any game is virtual and only appears as if it is real, when you play the game. If you do not participate in it, there is no world there. Alexius has no need to forget the world, he appears to be in, by getting lost in a world simulated via an electronic device, so he does not know any of the worlds so many seem to know a lot about from playing on those devices. Neither does he have a need to create a special world with special friends on Facebook or other social platforms – or be lost in the world with just a spouse. In that context he rather go the whole way and get lost in the enlightenment of that which is one.*

When you know you are playing a game, it is easy to pretend you are happy there. But if you have forgotten it is a game, all the things that seems to be around you, scares you – and so happiness becomes a fleeting thing.

When you know, you are playing a game, it is easy to pretend you are happy in its virtual world. But if you have forgotten it is not real, some of the things, that appears to be around you, seems scary – and so happiness becomes a fleeting thing.

Appearing to be in a world where there seems to be more than one can be compared to playing a virtual game. You cannot see that which is you because it is no different from that which is one and there is no oneness in a world where there seems to be more than one, so you appear to be totally separated from it. Everything that can you can see, experience or be conscious about is virtual because it takes more than one to see, experience or be conscious of anything.

Due to blinking you never see the present in its entirety – it is a fragmented experience. In other words now is make-believe.

As that which is one is not in a world where there seems to be more than one, so you will always feel a bit off appearing to be ´there´. Yet it is possible to feel good appearing to be ´there´ when you know that the experiences, you seem to have, are not real, and that you only pretend to be ´there´.** But if you believe, that you are there, and that your experiences prove the world is real, you must act upon them again and again – otherwise, you will lose your identity … and having no identity in the world is the end of you if you believe the world is real.

Gates_of_Eden_coverAt times I think there are no words
But these to tell what’s true
And there are no truths outside
the Gates of Eden

From ´Gates Of Eden´
by Bob Dylan.

There is nothing real in a virtual world, so do not mistake the words in this article for the truth, but simply a suggestion to take off the goggle simulating a world, that is not there. This is, of course, a metaphor. That which is you is not covered by a simulated world in a set of goggles, but the belief, there is more than that which is one.

Super powers are not real. It is a fantasy and so is living in the now and any experience of being, consciousness, bliss and whatnot.

Super powers are not real. It is a fantasy and so is living in the now and any experience of being conscious, blissful and whatnot.

Enlightenment of that which is one* is not of a world where there seems to be more than one, so it cannot be experienced. To experience pure being, living in the now or anything else considered to be spiritual can be compared to having super powers in a virtual reality game. Like everything else in the game it is something you are tricked into believing is possible. There is no pure being, living in the now or anything spiritual in a world where there seems to be more than one.

The world is make-believe, that like a the trick of a magician appears to be real.

The world is make-believe, that like the trick of a magician appears to be real. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 2:
If you are not someone who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one you cannot understand the basis of Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings – and if you are someone like that you have no need to understand anything.

Without the enlightenment of that which is one you have not ´seen´ that everything thing is unreal, so by reflex you will twist everything you see into the image you have already made of the world, which in one way or the other always is about the development of you and the world into being bigger in a better and/or higher way, but nothing Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings are about improving what and where you appear to be. Instead, it is about phasing out the belief in being someone at all. See also hack 3.7 Phasing out the personality.

It seems that within your belief system it is impossible to really know, that a world where there seems to be more than one is an illusion. As there is no more than that which is one and as to know something requires more than one, Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings seems to confirm this.

For the same reason, however, this confirmation is also an illusion, and that brings us to the purpose of his duality hacks, that whether you are not someone who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one or not, it is possible to see that the world is make-believe.

The way you see the world is founded on how much you believe, what the outer senses seem to tell you*. If you like what they seem to reveal by all means go on believing them and stop reading Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings. But if you do not like the world that the outer senses seem to prove is there, you could instead believe Alexius, who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one, when he tells you it is not there.

As a world where there seems to be more than one according to Alexius is make-believe, so is, of course, his statement about this. Yet you cannot appear in such a world without believing in something, so it is totally up to you whether you to decide if it is beneficial to believe in the world presented by the outer senses or the undoing of it as presented through the hacks of Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings.

A piece of soap is a helpful device, if you want to wash something away – and you can use it the way it fits your specific personality.

A piece of soap is a helpful device, if you want to wash something away – and it can be used in a way that fits your specific personality. The same applies to Alexius´ duality hacks. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings can be compared to a piece of soap, which has no power to do anything by itself – only in the hands of you does it become useful. In other words, you can use his duality hacks to wash away all your beliefs. They are by the way most effectively washed away by hack #2 Seeing symbols of life in the world. But if you do not like the smell of this one by all means try another flavour from his non-teachings or somewhere else.

If it makes you feel relieved relating to the world of the outer senses as an illusion, a natural consequence may be to have the belief in it completely undone. This, however, does not mean that you must follow Alexius or specific rules of his, because if the world is an illusion, so is follow anything in it. What it means is that in order to undo the belief in that which is not you by using that as it is, it may be beneficial to use the hack that this article is a part of, namely hack #2.1 Everything experienced is a symbol of life or one of the other duality hacks.

Enlightenment is not a light, that lights up something, so you will not see or know more than before. Rather you will know, everything that can be seen does not exists.

Enlightenment of that which is one is not a light, that lights up something, so it will not result in you seeing or knowing more than before. In fact, the light is so bright, that there is nothing to see. Hence you are nothing, and nobody knows, everything that can be seen is not real, because that which is one is formless and therefore endless, so there is no more that which cannot be seen. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

PART 3:
It seems enlightenment is often understood to result in some kind of detachment or freedom from the world, that you have while still experiencing to be there. But this is a utopian fusion of oneness and a world where there seems to be more than one. It is just another state of mind, and it has nothing to do with the enlightenment of that which is one*.

This enlightenment does not make you free or detached from the world. It simply terminates the perception of that or anything else. It may, however, be more correct to say, that it terminates the one believing to perceive something, and as the perceived is in the mind of the perceiver, it is terminated as well. The enlightenment of that which is one* does not replace the perceiver or the perceived with something else, as everything perceived is an illusion, so there is nothing to replace.

The enlightenment of that which is one simple states, there was or will be anything but the formlessness of that which is one, as it is formless and therefore endless.

The light in the enlightenment of that which is one is so bright, that there is nothing to see. The idea to be someone, who can see somebody else, is not even there. Yet it is in only the context of a world where there seems to be more than one, that this explanation may mean something. In reality it cannot be cannot be known what that which is one is, because it takes more than one to know something.

An explanation like this is only possible within the context of a world where there seems to be more than one. In that which is one, no explanation is possible, as it takes more than one to explain something. Not a problem though, because for the same reason, there is nobody in that which is one.


*) You can read about the enlightenment of that which is one in:

**) In hack #1.3 Pretending to be someone definitive is liberation. you can read about how pretending to be what you are not, undoes the belief in being someone definitive.


The general concept of healing seems to be, that when being touched by the right hands the body magically is healed. Ultimately speaking this is the opposite of healing, because it confirms the sick belief that you are a person in a body. The healing of this belief is ultimately speaking the only healing needed. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

NOTE: HEALING
Most seem to consider healing to be about fixing aspects of the body or the mind, but not about healing the cause of all sickness, namely the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one. This healing does not come from a magic hand or anything else a world defined by time and space – but from the enlightenment of that which is one.

NOTE: HACK #2.3 LIFE IS FLAT
In this hack – just like in the others – the words liferealityone perpetual present, eternal now, formless, endless, spirit, non-duality, one, oneness and that which is one in general are different words for the same, namely that which cannot be defined by time and space but simply is that which is.

That which is life is formless, so, compared to a world defined by time and space, it is flat and takes up no space. The formlessness of life cannot manifest a world defined by time and space, because formlessness is endless, so it has no outside and therefore no inside. In other words, as there is nothing outside it as well as inside of it a world defined by time and space is make-believe. There is no life in it, neither so-called spiritual parts of it as love, auras, god, astral worlds and whatnot.

NOTES: