(SH) NOTES No need to stop something, that is not there

To stop or not to stop something, that is not there, makes no difference as it is equally illusionary. It makes, however, a difference, if you stop believing there is something where there is nothing because then something does not appear to hide, there is nothing but the formlessness of oneness. The image is grabbed from the web.

In a world, where there seems to be more than one, you must always look for more – even though you may have grasped, there is no more than that which is one.

To want less is also to want more, because you want to have more of less.

If you try to stop looking for more, you are just enhancing the idea, that there must be more than that which is one. In other words, not looking for more is just as illusionary as looking for it, because there is no more than that which is one.


A world, where there seems to be more than one, is made up of contrasts like for example day and night. The opposites in a contrast are like two sides of a coin. You cannot have one without the other. Yet it is possible to exclude one of them from your awareness by projecting it onto something, that seems far away – for example, parts of your own body or somebody else´s.

Exclusion confirms separation and makes a world where there seems to be more than one appears to be real. But the apparent separation in such a world can also be used to undo the belief in it as real. This is done by including the two separated sides of a contrast, as inclusion cancels out their apparent separation.


There is nothing to accept because it takes two to accept something, and there is no more than that which is one. In other words, to accept yourself is to accept an illusion. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Being angry is not a problem, as long as you do not justify it, but totally include it. If you out of an old reflex hold onto anger, you may feel guilty and try to undo justifying it with the world by forgiving it. This, however, confirms the belief that there is more than that which is one.

But if you include justification and thus its contrast condemnation plus your guilt and thus its contrast innocence, you will get the sum of the contrasts, which as the sum of all other contrasts is nothing, because the inclusion of both sides in a contrast cancels it out. As that means your experience cannot be defined, you are in a state of not-knowing. In other words, there is nothing to justify, neither anything to feel guilty about or forgive – and that is a perfect moment.


The nature of a perfect moment is that every moment is the perfect moment. So while undoing the belief in a world, where there seems to be more than one, you also get what you always want in such a world, namely more – in this case, more perfect moments … and the more you get the more your belief in a world where there appear to be more than one is undone.

It is not a matter of believing or have faith in that which is one. On the contrary. It takes more than one to believe or have faith in something. In other words, whatever you believe or have faith in is an illusion.

When there is no more belief, that which cannot be believed, namely the formlessness of oneness, does not appear to be hidden by it.


You cannot undo the belief in being someone definitive without exposing it. This does not have to be painful, but to the degree that you still believe there is more than that which is one, it seems very painful that there is no more than that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

If you walk the way of inclusion, there is no going back, although it at times seemed easier, when the pain was suppressed. Jesus was in big pain on the cross, which seems to be unavoidable, if you want to know, what you are not, so the belief that you are someone definitive can be undone and not hide the formlessness of that which is you.


First all the thoughts you have excluded and then all excluded feelings will rush by in the first moments of death. Not for sentimental reasons or for you to understand or suss out anything but to be included so that there is not something to define you as someone definitive and thus nothing to hide there is no more than the formlessness of oneness.


A world where there seems to be more than one is a story made up by you, and if you seem to be caught in it while listening to it, you can tell it in another way, so the listener, which also is you, do not hear a story about exclusion but about inclusion. In other words, if you do not exclude what you judge as bad but include it, your story is not about separation but inclusion – and so the storyteller and the listener are connected.

Where there is connection there are no worries, and where there are no worries apparent differences do not make a difference. Consequently, there is no basis for the belief in separation and so it does not seem to hide the formlessness of oneness.


A person has many contrasting attributes, that may seem to be in conflict. No worries. This is not a problem when feelings judged to be ugly are not excluded but included, because inclusion place them on an equal foot, so that the apparent differences make no difference. Just like the different colors in this image make no difference to the beauty of the scenery. You may even say the differences enhance the beauty.

The apparent difference between the colours in this image makes no difference when all included. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

After reading hack #3.2 Inclusiveness is a perfect moment, you may conclude that being and having more should be avoided. If so, you have not gotten what it is all about, namely inclusion. In other words, no need to avoid anything. Wanting to be and have more is unavoidable in a world where there appears to be more than one since that is the wish it is founded on. Yet you do not need to believe that being and having more make a difference.

Inclusion can be compared to a black hole that sucks everything into it. In the end there is not even someone to include something, neither is there an end except for the belief of being someone specific.

By not excluding anything but including everything that you experience, exactly as it appears to be, the apparent difference between the experiences make no differences, and so there is no need to avoid or cherish anyone in particular.

To include something is of course just as illusionary than anything else, that requires more than one. Yet the illusion of inclusion is a way to use the belief that there is more than that which is one to undo it.

This is not meant to say, that you have to stop anything in order to undo the belief in separation. But if it is part of your personality to do so, you just include that trait. In other words, nothing is wrong as long as not excluded but included. Even the tendency to exclude is not wrong when included.


  • To not be exclusive but inclusive does not mean, you must accept all appearances of the world, but that you include the disgust that some appearances seem to trigger as much as you include the feeling of joy that others seem to bring.
  • This article is part of hack #3.2 Inclusiveness is a perfect moment.


  1. […] When nothing is wrong or missing you are not of the world, though you appear to be thereAnger has no power when included […]

  2. […] moment. Thus it became part of the theme in this revised version. See also the next article Anger has no power when included, which is a nota bene to this […]