+(+) When unwillingness is included, it is not different from willingness

If you are unwilling to undo your belief in a world, where there appear to be more than one, you do not need to change that, because if you include your unwillingness you will also include your willingness, as like any other contrast they are like two sides of the same coin. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

If you are unwilling to undo the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one, you do not need to change that, because if you unwillingness is included, willingness is includes as well, since two opposite sides of a contrast are like two sides of the same coin.

To include something means, that you do not exclude it by projecting it onto others and blame them for what is yours. Not that it actually is yours. Nothing is, because somebody, who appear to be and/or have more than that which is one, is an illusion, as there is no more than that which is one, since it is formless and therefore endless.

Nobody has created Mickey Mouse, because he does not exist, neither does the world where he seems to live – even though there seems to be elements of reality in it.

Since the world where you believe to be is nothing but empty space, it is not the world but your experience of it that is fabricated. It includes what you believe to be, as well as the question, who is fabricating the experience? The question is very important to those who want to believe a world where there seems to be more than one is real, because even though nobody has ever been able to answer it, the question seems to proof, that there is more than that which is one.

While you appear to be and/or have more than that which is one, there are things you seem to have or not to have. In this context, everything is yours, because the imagination of a world where there seems to be more than one is fabricated by you.

Thus everything that you experience in such a world – whether it seems to be inside or outside, so-called spiritual or mundane – is yours. So to undo the experience of a world where there seems to be more than one you must include every experience exactly as it is fabricated by you.*

Mickey Mouse looks very happy, but there is no happiness in him except for what you believe to be there.

A world where there seems to be more than one can be compared to a movie in the sense that it consists of nothing but zeros and ones if it is a digital one, and if it is an analogue movie the illusion of a world on the screen is made by the subtraction of light. Even though here is nothing there it appears to make you forget that which is real.

Without exclusion there is no separation
In other words, if you do not want your fabricated experience, that is based on the belief in separation, to hide the formlessness of oneness, you can undo the fabrication by including every aspect of it as your idea. Do not worry, if you are not willing to undo all parts of your experience as ideas of yours.

Unwillingness** does not matter when not justified, but included as yours. No need to worry either, if you are justifying unwillingness. The same that applies to unwillingness applies to justification. It makes no difference when included as yours.


*) Hack #8.8 Alone together is the key to that which is one is also about the inclusion of everything experienced as yours.

**) See also the articles about willingness in hack #3.5 Inclusiveness is pure bliss.


NOTE: The graphics in this article, that is part of hack #3.2 Inclusiveness is a perfect moment. are grabbed from the web.

 

Trackbacks

  1. […] No worries. If you acknowledge, that you are not willing to include everything, you are including the moment as it is, and thus entering the road of inclusiveness. See also Unwillingness is not different from willingness when included. […]

  2. […] No worries. If you acknowledge, that you are not willing to include everything, you are including the moment as it is, and thus entering the road of inclusiveness. See also Unwillingness is not different from willingness when included. […]

  3. […] No worries. If you acknowledge, that you are not willing to include everything, you are including the moment as it is, and thus entering the road of inclusiveness. See also Unwillingness is not different from willingness when included. […]