PMT No belief can survive inclusion, because a belief is based on excluding something

Separation is make-believe. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 1:
If you are into giving or sending love, you believe separation is the reality, as without division there would be no ´you´ to give or send love to ´others´. The same applies to be empathic with others or some other do-gooder idea. Any kind of being excludes something, so that you can become someone, who makes a difference by generously giving to those you judge to be or have less than you.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

As it takes more than one to believe in something, it is not possible to believe in anything in the reality of that which is one, unless imagined there is more than that which is one

The imagination of this can be compared to covering your eyes with your hands, so there does not appear to be anything else than the fantasy. To this illusion all that is needed is to take away your hands.

Believing Santa Claus is bringing gifts to all good children one night a year does not change anything. The gifts are coming from your parents. Likewise believing that it is possible to be and have more than which is one is not gonna make it real. Yet this childish belief hides the obvious, namely that there is no more than that which is one.

To have something specific is not possible, as there is no more than the formlessness of that which is one. But to have everything is not just possible, it is the reality of oneness, because formlessness is endless.

Any belief is an exclusion of that which is one, as it takes more than one to believe something. The inclusion of a belief, however, undoes the idea that there is more than that which is one. In other words, no need to stop giving or sending love or anything else you believe to be real, as the inclusion of this nonsense undoes the value you attributed to give and receive love and therefore that it is possible to be separated from that which is one.

Taking everything personal is a way way to keep distance and therefore to confirm separation and that you are something special. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Taking everything personal is a way to enhance the belief in being someone definitive, who is separated from a world experienced to be outside of what you believe to be. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 2:
If you judge for example the wind to have the power to change your state of mind, you believe to be a person in a world where there seems to be more than one and the wind to do something personally to you, even though it does not know you. This applies as well to the other appearance that looks like you. They do not know you – neither themselves, because there is no self. Hence it is make-believe that something personal has ever been done to you.

The sun never rises or sets, because it does not move around the earth. It is the earth, that moves around the sun, but as you consider yourself to be the crown of creation, you think you are the centre of everything.

What seems to be you is a fabrication based on what you perceive to be moving around you, and as that perception is the result of what you have excluded from what you believe to be you, what is perceived to be outside of you is experienced as very personal.

Whether you perceive to give love or hate, the belief in separation is enhanced, because only if you believe that you and the receiver is separated can you perceive to give something.

Although it appears to cause much pain keeping a personality together by perceiving a personal world outside of it, you compulsively go on to judge everything as personal, because that is the way to hide the impersonal reality of that which is one.

To be a boy, you must exclude being a girl, and so defined as a boy you long for the girl you have excluded – and vice versa.The graphic is grabbed from the web.

To be a boy, you must exclude being a girl – and so defined as a boy you long for the girl you have excluded – and vice versa. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 3:
If you do not adjust to the established concepts of a world where there seems to be more than one and make sure to appear as a man when you have a penis or a woman when you have none, you are judged as a traitor to society and thus excluded from it. This separation makes both those that seem to be part of society those excluded from feeling more alive, as they mistake separation the feeling of being someone definitive for being alive.

Nobody is born a boy or a girl though. Those concepts are just like the value added to the colour of skin, age and whatnot appearing to define you as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one are a construction of thoughts compiled to keep everybody in predefined categories, so that they are confirmed as someone definitive separated from a world defined to be outside of them. But you cannot be someone definitive, as it takes more than one to be someone, and you are that which is you is the formlessness of oneness.

You are not an American, a Russian, a Christian or a musician. You are nothing at all. It is just something you want to believe, so that you appear to be and something contrary to the formless of oneness, that has nothing, as it takes more than one to have something.

Yet it seems possible to believe that you are someone definitive and maintain that belief by following the concepts of the world. This conditioning may seem as if it is forced upon you by parents and society. But that is not so. You freely adhere to them in order to be in the rat race for being and having more than that which is one.

This is not to say, that you must stop this in order to not hide the formlessness of that which is one by the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one. As such a world is not real, you need not to change anything there, but the belief that you are there.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

What you want to hide from your personality, you exclude by projecting it onto others, so that you can be defined as better than them. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 4:
Being exclusive you appear to be the opposite of what you exclude. If you exclude what you judge to be bad, for example, you appear to be good. In other words, you are defined by what you exclude. That is the way to be somebody in a world where there seems to be more than one.

The main reason for being exclusive is that being inclusive you will not appear to be entirely correct but also mistaken, and being mistaken must be avoided at any cost in order not to be reminded of your original mistake, namely to believe in separation.

To be inclusive instead of exclusive is not complicated at all but plain simply, as all you have to do is to not exclude. If you, however, are not aware of how you continuously exclude something judged to be bad in order to make others appear as wrong and you as right, you cannot choose not to exclude and thus stop the glorification of separation.

You do not become nobody by excluding what makes you appear to be someone specific but by including it. When everything definable is included there is nothing excluded to define you as someone specific.

But when you realise that being someone definitive in a world in a world where there seems to be more than one does not have a happy ending no matter how much you exclude in order to become better, you know choosing to be exclusive is not in your own best interest and so you are ready to stop it. As that means you are all-inclusive, there is nobody but you. You are alone together with the experience of a world where there seems to be more than one.

When nothing is excluded there is no feeling of being something, neither of being alone or anything else, as there is no more than the formlessness of oneness, and it takes more than one to be something.

It does not seem to hide that which is one anymore though because it is no different from that the oneness of that which is you.

If you focus on the contrasts of this image, you probably end up deducing something and therefore conclude, you are someone definitive looking at something that you understand. But if you defocus, the contrasts disappears and there is not something to deduce and therefore nothing to understand. When you do not understand anything, you do not know what and where you are and so there is no knowledge to hide that which cannot be known, namely the formlessness of oneness. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

»Confirmation bias refers to a type of selective thinking whereby one tends to notice and to look for what confirms one´s beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts one´s beliefs.« The Skeptic´s Dictionary.

PART 5:
Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings
are written from the perspective of nobody, but as most fight hard to appear as if they are somebody, they automatically twist them into something that confirms their belief in being unique.

To make it look as if there is more than one in the world, your thoughts are constantly used fabricate an image of somebody appearing to be outside of the thoughts you have compiled to be you. In this way, specific thoughts establish you as someone thinking them and other thoughts of you meeting somebody else.

Alexius has no compassion for anybody because he sees nobody. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

When you do not believe the division of thoughts into me and them makes a difference the fabrication of you as someone definitive cannot be upheld. In other words, when the specific thoughts, that are excluded from what appears to be you in order to make it appear as if there are more than you, are included instead, there does not appear to be anybody outside of you and therefore nobody to acknowledge you like somebody.

If you want to believe, that you are unique with your own path to follow and that there is someone special only for you, you do not want the reality of that which is one, because in the formlessness of oneness nobody is unique, since it requires more than one to be unique or anything at all. In other words, there is nobody in the formlessness of oneness. Neither anywhere else, as formlessness is endless.

Hence there is no separation and thus nobody else but you. Not the limited you, that you believe to be, but that which is everything, namely the formlessness of oneness. See also hack #3.3 Phasing out the personality by not being exclusive.

Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

But as that which is everything is formless, it seems to be nothing in a world defined by time and space, so most choose to interpret not being exclusive but inclusive as a way to own one´s thoughts or to accept, as this implies they are someone definitive understanding Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings. Yet they forget, that to understand them is to not know what they are about because the formlessness of oneness cannot be known since there is no more than that which is one.

Believing to be someone specific you want to feel validated by resonating with somebody or something perceived to be like-minded.. If you find such validation in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings you have overlooked their basic message, namely that there is no more than that which is one and therefore nothing to resonate with.

When the duality hacks are applied there is nobody to understand them because they neutralise all contrasts, and without them, there is not something to perceive, neither someone to perceive anything.

What you seem to think or do only matters if you believe, you are someone specific. When you are nobody nothing matters, neither if you seem to think or do as if it does, because there is no ´I´ with the intention of manifesting itself to be somebody.

So if you had expected inclusion to be the way to something new, you have gotten it wrong. Inclusion leads to nothing. But when there is nothing, there is not something to hide there is no more than the formlessness of oneness.

The idea of living in the now is an attempt to exclude what is judged to be bad, so you can be judged as good.The graphic is grabbed from the web.


The idea of getting freedom and power from living in the now is an attempt to exclude what is judged to be bad so you can be judged as good and only that. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

APPENDIX:
There seem to be certain thoughts, that need to be avoided before you can be living in the now. according to the concepts established about the nowThis means, however, that you are not living now but later.

More to the point, you are living in the past, because the now that is supposed to come when negative thoughts and whatnot has been excluded is a result of your past ideas or doctrines about what is now and what is now, whereas in a perfect moment everything is now, since it includes everything, no matter if you are thinking of the past in a regretting or happy way, or about the future in worried or excited fashion.

Who but those, who judge others to be bad, have the need to appear as good?

In other words, the search for freedom in the now is an attempt to escape the present moment as it is by editing it and thereby avoiding its intimacy.


NOTES:

  • For the not so spiritual-minded person, the goal may be to be a bad-ass, but that is just another way of following concepts of how to become someone definitive so you can fence off the intimacy of being all-inclusive by always respond in relation to the personality you have created.
  • This article is part of hack #3.1 Every moment is the perfect moment.