Inclusion excludes the idea, that you are someone special

There is an understanding to deduce from this image, as there is still some contrasts left in it. In other words you can conclude you somebody looking at something. But if you include the contrasts, there is nothing to deduce and therefore nothing to understand. When you do not understand anything you do not know what and where you are and so there is nothing to hide that which is you, namely the formlessness of that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

If you focus on the contrasts of this image, you can deduce something from it and therefore conclude you are someone definitive looking at something, that you understand. But if you defocus, the contrasts disappears and there is not something to deduce and therefore nothing to understand. When you do not understand anything you do not know what and where you are and so there is no knowledge to hide that which is you, namely the formlessness of that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

»Confirmation bias refers to a type of selective thinking whereby one tends to notice and to look for what confirms one´s beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts one´s beliefs.« The Skeptic´s Dictionary.

Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings are written from the perspective of nobody, but as most fight hard to be appear as someone who matters, they automatically twist Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings into something that confirms their belief in being someone special.

To make it look as if there is someone in the world, you must constantly fabricate an image of somebody appearing to be outside of the thoughts you seem to have, so that these thoughts can be judged as yours in order to establish you as someone thinking them.

I do not have compassion for anybody, because I see nobody.

When you do not believe the division of thoughts into me and them makes a difference the fabrication of you as someone definitive cannot be upheld. In other words, when specific thoughts are not excluded from what appears to be you but included, there does not appear to be anybody outside of you and therefore nobody to acknowledge you as somebody.

If you want to believe, you are someone specific and that there is someone special only for you, you do not want the reality of that which is one, as it is that there is nobody to love and therefore nobody to be loved, because that requires more than one.

As this means there is no separation and you therefore cannot be someone specific, most will not take this part of Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings literally but interpret to not be exclusive but inclusive as a way to own one´s thoughts, as this implies they are someone special who understands Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings – although they cannot be understood.

Believing to be someone specific you want to feel validated by resonating with something. If you find such validation in Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings you have overlooked their basic message, namely that there is no more than that which is one and therefore nothing to resonate with.

When Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings are applied there is nobody to understand them. The inclusion of all thoughts neutralises all contrasts, and without them there is not something to perceive, neither someone to perceive anything.

What you seem to think or do only matters if you believe, you are someone specific. When you are nobody nothing matters, neither if you seem to think or do as if it does, because there is no ´I´ with the intention of manifesting itself to be somebody.

So if you had expected inclusion to lead to something, you have gotten it wrong. Inclusion leads to nothing – at least in the context of the world. But when there is nothing, there is not something to hide that which is everything, namely the formlessness of that which is one.


NOTE: This article is the intro to hack #3.3 To include is to not exclude.