Without contrasts there is no duality, and so nothing seems to hide non-duality

When contrasts meet they cancel each other out, so if you for example do not exclude negativity in order to experience positivity, you would not be able to judge something as positive. In other words, when all contrasts are included, you would not even be able to experience yourself as someone definitive. You would be that which you always have been and always will be, namely the formlessness of that which is one, which cannot be experienced as there are no contrasts in that which is formless.

When contrasts meet, they cancel out each other, so if you for example do not exclude negativity in order to experience positivity, you will not be able to judge something as positive or negative. In other words, when all contrasts are included, you are not even be able to perceive yourself as someone definitive, and so there is nothing to hide that which you always have been and always will be, namely the formlessness of that which is one. It cannot be experienced though, as there are no contrasts in formlessness. For the same reason it is not a state of being either. It is simply one perpetual present. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

In the milliseconds after the big bang two different worlds were about to evolve, one of matter (the one we believe to see) and one of antimatter. Matter and antimatter, however, cannot coexist. When they meet an incredible amount of energy is released, and they both disappear in one big flash

Antimatter therefore had to be excluded in order for matter to be experienced as a tangible universe defined by time and space. This does not mean though that antimatter disappeared. As the world is in the eye of the beholder, antimatter only needed to be excluded from there. That is why science cannot find it, although it according to their observations of the universe must be there.

Dying defines the conditions of living in a world of duality.

As a world of duality only can be seen through contrasts and as the beholder have to exclude one side of it in order to experience the other – the experience of beauty, for example, requires its contrast ugliness to be excluded – what happened in the milliseconds after the big bang is repeated again and again.

So if the beholder does not exclude one of the two parts of a contrast but include them both – for example positivity and negativity – they will just like the contrast of matter and antimatter cancel each other out.

The meeting of contrasts has been avoided since the beginning of duality in order to make it appear as if it duality and not non-duality is real, so if you do not want the belief in this illusion to hide that which is real, you simply include both sides of a contrast in order for them to meet and in one big flash undo the appearance of separation.

When contrast are not kept apart, so that you can experience one part of it on the expense of the other, they annihilate each other in one big flash. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

When contrast are not kept apart in order to separately experience one part of it on the expense of the other, they annihilate each other in one big flash. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

In other words, when all contrasts are included, the beholder, including the world of duality that it beholds, is canceled out in one big flash. This is what is called the enlightenment of that which is one* in Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings.

More, faster and cheaper is the common mantra. And to make it work the formlessness of non-duality is replaced with a world of duality, that is imagined in contrasts of more and less, fast and slow, cheap and expensive and so on.

Most, however, do not want to be canceled out. On the contrary, they always are looking for the next big thing, that can to make them more happy and perfect as someone special and unique. Yet happiness cannot be felt without its contrast sadness and there is no perfection without imperfection. It is just not possible to know that you are experiencing a specific feeling or state of mind without knowing its contrast, which is only possible when you believe to be someone in a world of duality.

All experiences are deceptive – also the experience of dimension. Reality is more flat than this image, because it is the formlessness of that which is one and formlessness is sizeless. Besides it takes more than one to experience something and as formlessness is endless, there is no more than that which is one. When defocusing contrasts fades out and so the brain cannot fabricate an illusion of reality. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

When defocusing contrasts fades out, and so the brain cannot fabricate an illusion of duality. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

But as non-duality is no different from that which is one and as duality requires more than one, it is an illusion. Should you choose to have this exposed and consequently the belief in duality is undone, cancelling out contrasts by being inclusive is a way to go, but there are also others. Below are a few suggestions:


*) You can read about the enlightenment of that which is one in

Trackbacks

  1. […] to follow. See the explanation of those in the caption of the colour models. And see the article Without contrasts there is no duality, and so nothing seems to hide non-duality for more comparisons with science relating […]

  2. […] See the explanation of those in the first caption of the colour models. And see the article Without contrasts there is no duality, and so nothing seems to hide non-duality for more comparisons with science relating […]

  3. […] Without contrasts there is no duality, and so nothing seems to hide non-duality […]

  4. […] of life in a world where there seems to be more than one It is NOT about making a difference Without contrasts there is no duality, and so nothing seems to hide non-duality Coming from the heart is denial of that which is one Cheating the ego by being […]