To understand is to insist in being separated from that which is one

Most make up a story about a better person, that they try to become in order to feel more happy. But since reality is that which is one, there is no more to become. And for the same reason nothing to feel than that what is fake. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The idea of you being transformed into pure consciousness of oneness is based on the belief that you are someone definitive, as if not you cannot be conscious of anything. And to uphold this belief, you must constantly fence off what you want to be conscious about, namely that which is one, as it takes more than one to be someone.

A very effective way to do this is to always compare the present with the past and thereby for example experience to be more spiritual than before, because there is no before in oneness, as it is one perpetual present. Also, there is no more than that which is one, since it is formless an therefore endless, so becoming more spiritual is an illusion.

In the above you most likely have separated out the words you are most familiar with, for example transformed, present and past, and interpreted them in a way so you seem to have read something confirming your belief in being someone definitive in a world defined by time and space.

But as it is very difficult to twist one perpetual present into something that makes sense in such a world, you may have blocked out this expression. Or if you have seen or heard this phrase before, for example in the context of the guru you are following, you may say »Aha Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings is similar to the sayings of my guru.«

You are probably not reading Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings, but your own story of a world where there seems to be more than one. See the article Eyes do not see, they translate.

And even though you may not know how your guru interpret this phrase, your belief in being someone definitive has been confirmed by your apparent understanding of it as being similar to something your guru says. 

Nothing in a world where there seems to be more than one is understandable, since it takes more than one to understand anything, and there is no more than that which is one. That is also the reason neither oneness is understandable.

That is unless you believe, that there is more than that which is one, and therefore denies that which cannot be denied – namely that which is one – as that requires more than one.

Within the fantasy of world defined by time and space, nobody returns from a dream that they seem to have there, because there is nobody in the dream. Likewise nobody returns from a world defined by time and space, because oneness is formless and therefore endless, so there is nobody in a world defined by time and space. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Yet there is nothing to understand in Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings, nor is there anything to compare them to, as it takes more than one to understand or compare something, and what they states is that there is no more than that which is one, since it is formless and therefore endless.

For the same reason, however, Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings are just as illusionary as anything else in a world defined by time and space  – and so are the duality hacks. Yet the application of them makes you forget what and where you are, so nobody is walking the road without length to the formlessness of that which is one.


NOTE: This article is the last one of hack #3.6 Phasing out the personality.

Trackbacks

  1. […] **) See also the article To understand is to insist in being separated from that which is one. […]