INTRO TO HACK #4-7.2, From the inner senses through a black hole into that which is one

_IGP9809-Edit-5

This glimpse of a leaf has not much to do with the actual leaf, just like a glimpse of a star has nothing to do with the actual brightness of it. Likewise experiencing glimpses of the enlightenment of that which is one has nothing in common with that which is one. It cannot be experienced, as it takes more than one to experience something. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

To bid the enlightenment of that which is one welcome a person has to momentarily step aside, so there is nothing conceivable hiding that which cannot be conceived, namely the enlightenment of that which is one. In other words, there is nobody to experience it.

Ny non teachings are not using the word enlightenment to describe someone who have achieved a better understanding or a higher consciousness. You do not get wiser or higher from the enlightenment mentioned in my non teachings, because it is the enlightenment of that which is one, and it requires more than one to become wiser or higher or to have any kind of consciousness. In the enlightenment of that which is one you simply cease to exist as someone definitive, either momentarily or for good.

Most though return to a world where there seems to be more than one after a short moment in the enlightenment of that which is one. They simply avoid going into the formlessness of oneness by justifying their fear of destruction, as if it is caused by that which is one, and so they are back in a world where there seems to be more than one. If they had not tried to exclude their fear but included it, the enlightenment of that which is one would not had been blocked out.

Nobody walks around in the world enlightened of that which is one, because a person cannot be enlightened. But a person can have vague memories of it, and therefore be someone who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one.

If you momentarily step aside as someone definable, the enlightenment of that which is one will erase all the thoughts, you have collected to fabricate yourself as someone definable, and as nobody you are sucked through a black hole into that which is one. But that does not mean you are enlightened, if you reappear as someone definable in a world where there seems to be more than one.

The enlightenment of that which is one is one perpetual present and that cannot be brought back into a world of linear time. Yet there may be vague memories of it, and so you are to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one.

These memories are not gonna make you wiser or help you change anything in the world. Neither do you expect that, because you know the world is an illusion – or as science states, it is 99 percent empty space and one percent energy, so anything experienced there is make-believe.

Glimpses of the enlightenment of that which is one may look like this image from out of space, but it will not be experienced as if outside of you but inside. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Glimpses of the enlightenment of that which is one may look like this image from out of space, but it will not be experienced as if outside of you but inside. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Enlightenment of that which is one versus glimpses of it
Hardly anybody ever bid the enlightenment of that which is one welcome. It is more common to bid welcome the glimpses of it, because contrary to the enlightenment of that which is one they can be experienced, and so they can be interpreted as they are making you someone better or higher in a world where there seems to be more than one.

The enlightenment of that which is one cannot be experienced, as it takes more than one to experience something. Therefore nobody can tell you, what it is or teach you how to bid it welcome. Yet you can learn not to bid welcome a world where there seems to be more than one, so your belief in it does not appear to hide that which is one.

Enlightenment of that which is one is impersonal but the description of it is personal
If the enlightenment of that which is one is exactly like described in my non teachings, Alexius cannot tell you. He has not experienced it, as nothing definable can enter it. But he has vague memories of something indefinable after returning from being nobody in the enlightenment of that which is one to the appearance of being somebody in a world where there seems to be more than one.

Please be aware that even though the enlightenment of that which is one is impersonal, the memories of them are personal, and so is how they are expressed in my non teachings. In other words, they cannot be replicated by you, neither by Alexius by the way. First of all, because it takes more than one to replicate something, and secondly because there is nothing personal in the enlightenment of that which is one.

Yet my personal descriptions of the enlightenment of that which is one may inspire you to undo the belief in being someone definitive, so that there is nothing to hide the enlightenment of that which is one. Part of undoing this belief is to forget everything you have heard or read about enlightenment – including what think you have read about it in my non teachings.


NOTES: 

Trackbacks

  1. […] you think is wrong in yourself or the world, which is the same as the world is in the eye of the beholder, and try to change, you´ll instead confirm, that what you think is […]

  2. […] it´s only for One The world is in the eye of the beholder You choose how to perceive your life I ain´t got no body to depend on Far from Home You ain´t […]

  3. […] the body healthy and not care about it Don´t count on bodily experiences for your wellbeing I ain´t got no body to depend on Reappearing from death as more physical than ever Last night I died again Pretending to be a person […]