I am the Destroyer of Worlds!

Painting with reflections of light on my iPhone

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings talks about two kinds of enlightenment, namely the enlightenment of that which is one, which cannot be experienced as that requires more than one, and glimpses of it that is experienced through the inner senses when the outer ones are partly closed. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

After a long, intense night of driving taxi many years ago, Alexius forgot what and where he was, and so there was nothing to hide the enlightenment of that which is one.

When he later read The New Testament and Bhagavad Gita, there were passages, that triggered memories of the enlightenment of that which is one. They were vague, though, because Alexius did not experience it since it takes more than one to do so. Nevertheless, the faint memories of something indefinable are enough to know that everything definable is an illusion. That is why he is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one.

The enlightenment of that which is one is enlightenment in a very literal sense, like when Jesus said: When your eyes become single your whole body will be full of light – or like St. Paul, when he was blinded by light – or like Arjuna according to Bhagavad Gita said after having been initiated by Krishna: »It is brighter than thousands of suns. I have become the destroyer of worlds …«

A dream can be compared to a simulated world meanwhile layered on top that which is real. As long as you believe the simulated world to be real, it will seem to cover that which is real, as if it does not exist.

But Alexius would not put it like that. There is nobody in the enlightenment of that which is one, so there is not a body to be full of light, neither a world to destroy. The world is not there, and there is no memory of it ever having been there. It is like a dream that is no more when you wake up in the morning.

The translations of both The New Testament and Bhagavad Gita differs from translator to translator, and as the above quotes are from memory, they may not be the exact words in your addition. But it does not matter, because regardless of how you speak about it, the enlightenment of that which is one cannot be described. In other words, what is said about it in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings should not be taken as the real thing, nor as pointers towards it, as that requires more than one.

Imagine you want to describe an orange to somebody who has never seen or tasted an orange. Maybe you say it has the colour of an orange sunset, is round like a ball and taste as sweetened water. Yet the person, that you have given this description, will never find out what an orange is by drinking sweet water from a rounded cup at sunset.

You have to see and taste it yourself to know what it is. But in the context of the enlightenment of that which is one, you will never know what it is, because a person cannot be enlightened. You as a person is erased by the enlightenment of that which is one. Thus there is nobody there to experience it.

In the enlightenment of that which is one, the world is not anymore. Not because it has been destroyed, but because it has never been – except as a fantasy. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Some think the enlightenment of that which is one is to see god in everyone. This is delusional. There is no god in the world. In the context of god and the world, think of electricity illuminating a room via a bulb. You see the room due to the power of electricity. But you cannot see electricity. It is not in the room illuminated by the bulb. In the context of god, however, god is not anywhere because it takes more than one to be somewhere, and there is no more than that which is one since it is formless and therefore endless.

If you return to a world where there seems to be more than one after the enlightenment of that which is one, there is no more need to search for the meaning of life, because you know there is no more than that which is one. Hence there is no life a world where it seems to be more than one. Besides to search for something requires more than one, so whatever you think you realise is not real.

One who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one has no need to be forgiven or loved, as there is no ´I´ deciding what to do and therefore nobody to forgive or love. But when there is no ´I´ to protect and preserve, there is the freedom to pretend to be anyone, so in the context of a game like Monopoly, you may appear to be a red car one day and a blue one another day.

To make long short: There is no need to keep together an appearance of someone with coherent opinions and behaviour. You are free to use the ´I´ as a tool, just like you use like your leg, hand eyes, and so on.

Alexius, for example, has pretended to be a child, teenager, taxi driver, monk, husband, daddy, adult, business Man, millionaire, designer, teacher, photographer and recently non-teacher.

Regarding the enlightenment of that which is one, it is best to forget everything you have ever heard or read about it – including what is said in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings. Any idea of any form that you might think it has is wrong. It has no shape, it is formless. Yet, if you look for something intangible, you still look for something. But if you do not believe to be someone definitive – or do not care about it – there does not seem to be something hiding it.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #6-7.1 From the inner senses through a black hole into that which is one.

Trackbacks

  1. […] for the advertising business, the articles would probably reach a broader audience. But as enlightenment is the most raw and original thing, you can have revealed in the world of duality, it seems best […]

  2. […] of not-knowing. However if you have been enlightened, you will certainly have a memory of your whole body being full of light, as Jesus describes it – or seeing a light brighter than 1000s of suns, as Arjuna describes it. […]

  3. […] actually it is not sucking you into the black hole. Nobody can go there. The immense power of the light destroys you and leave you at the threshold of the black hole and then there is nothing but that which […]

  4. […] Everything that appears to not be one is illusionary One is one, and one is all there is Non-duality is to be compared to a computer The speed of reality is one perpetual present The construction and deconstruction of the personality What is unreal is right in front of you All experiences are unreal All thoughts are grabbed from the cloud You want to be deceived, and so you are Nothing that can be seen does exist Bored by reality From non-duality to duality and back Life is the cause of the dream called the world What is real, is right in front of you A person is meant to follow preprogrammed movements Nobody in a game is real – only the player is Pretending to be a person can be compared to streaming music Eyes don´t see, they translate You can´t see this article Far from Home You ain´t going nowhere What is freedom!? I am the Destroyer of Worlds! […]

  5. […] die from the world of the outer senses and be in the realm of the inner senses with enlightenment and its brothers and sisters holy breath/name, celestial music and nectar can be compared to a […]

  6. […] enlightenment, can be experienced through the inner senses. This article and the previous NEW THEME: I am the Destroyer of Worlds! is about maxi enlightenment and the next one Life has no secrets is about mini […]

  7. […] enlightenment, can be experienced through the inner senses. This article and the previous NEW THEME: I am the Destroyer of Worlds! is about maxi enlightenment and the next one Life has no secrets is about mini […]

  8. […] of that which is one is not of the world The enlightenment of that which is one, does not results in some kind of spiritual understanding or connection with a higher spiritual […]

  9. […] returning to a world where there seems to be more than one there will be vague memories of a world where there seems to be more than one destroyed by a light stronger than 1000s of sun and le…, as Arjuna in Bhagavad Gita describes it after returning from the enlightenment of that which is […]

  10. […] from it to a world where there seems to be more than one, there is vague memories of such a world being destroyed by a light stronger than 1000s of sun and leaving nothing but that which is…, as Arjuna describes it in the Bhagavad […]

  11. […] where there seems to be more than one as a visually minded person, you may have vague memories of a light brighter than thousands of suns as the enlightenment of that which is one is described in the Bhagavad Gita. Neither is there […]

  12. […] where there seems to be more than one as a visually minded person, you may have vague memories of a light brighter than thousands of suns as the enlightenment of that which is one is described in the Bhagavad Gita. Neither is there […]

  13. […] where there seems to be more than one as a visually minded person, you may have vague memories of a light brighter than thousands of suns as the enlightenment of that which is one is described in the Bhagavad Gita. Neither is there […]

  14. […] memory of the enlightenment of that which is one makes all differences in the world fade away, so that everything become the same symbol of life. […]

  15. […] memory of the enlightenment of that which is one makes all differences in the world fade away, so that everything become a symbol of life. But […]

  16. […] where there seems to be more than one as a visually minded person, you may have vague memories of a light brighter than thousands of suns as it is described in the Bhagavad Gita. Neither is there anybody hearing it, but if you are an […]

  17. […] where there seems to be more than one as a visually minded person, you may have vague memories of a light brighter than thousands of suns as it is described in the Bhagavad Gita. Neither is there anybody hearing it, but if you are an […]

  18. […] But this is not to say, that the basic self is closer to that which is real or that there are steps back to that which is real. Nothing in an illusion is closer to that which is real. Something is either real or not. There is no transition. Alexius went straight to bid welcome the enlightenment of that which is one without taking any steps and without knowing about oneness. Read more about that here. […]

  19. […] This does not mean that you have to be a basic self in order to undone the believe in being someone definitive, but that it may be easier. Yet Alexius does not know, if he was a basic or special self, when he for the first time about 50 years ago bid the enlightenment of that which is one welcome, because he forgot to remember what and where he was. Read more about that here. […]

  20. […] That being said, you do not have to be the basic self, pure or anything else to have that belief undone. All that is needed is simply to forget to remember what and where you are, as that is the invitation the enlightenment of that which is one is waiting for. Read more about that here. […]

  21. […] Alexius does not know, if he was a basic or special self, when he for the first time about 50 years ago bid the enlightenment of that which is one welcome, because he forgot to remember what and where he was. Read more about that here. […]