++[+] Oneness is pointless [draft]

You cannot point to that which is one since doing so requires more than one, but you can point to that which is not one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

If you experience something, you are hallucinating because reality is that which is one, and it takes more than one to experience something. As it also takes more than one to point out something  Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings do not point to that which is real but that which is unreal, namely any experience of something, mundane or spiritual.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

What you believe to be is the brain, because all your experiences are created and stored there. Also, if they are experienced to come from the heart (read more about that here).

As it always takes one second for the brain to fabricate an experience, including to be authentic, at peace, or in the now, what you believe to be aware of now is an image of the past (read more about that here), that according to the brain is built from the frequencies it received from your sensory system one second ago.

Though you only have the brains word for that, you choose to believe that it is a fact because if not all your experiences are exposed as fantasies constructed by the brain from out of nothing (read more about that here). For those who question the brains assertion about the origin of your experiences, it has another lie, namely that your experiences are based on info coming from the chakras.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Life never gives second chances, as it takes more than one to give something and it is that which is one. Besides that which is you does not need anything. It has everything because there is no more than that which is life since it is formless and therefore endless.

For the same reason, only oneness can be the source of the belief in separation. Thus being true to this belief, you confirm what it denies. Consequently, the belief in separation is a positive confirmation of oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Oneness is one perpetual present, which has nothing to do with being in the now, as it requires more than one to be somewhere. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

No-one is what they appear to be. Not in the sense that their real self is hidden underneath their appearance, but in a sense that any appearance – whether spiritual or mundane – is unreal because it requires more than one to appear as something, and there is no more than that which is one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

As oneness is formless, it is sizeless. Thus there is not something to point to.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Let us say you live in a cold clime but would like it to move to one of those you have seen in movies where people wear slippers and shorts all year long. Replicating that, however, will not make you warmer. Nor will drinking a fancy cocktail with a little umbrella, singing songs in a foreign language, or changing your name to something more exotic. It will all make you look very special, but you will not be warmer. On the contrary.

This is a metaphor to illustrate that chanting, hugging, dressing in special clothes, getting a new name, thinking positive, and whatnot does not transform you into something better or higher. Actually, there is not something better to be because there is no more than that which is one, and it takes more than one to be better than that.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You cannot know that which is one when you experience to be in a world where there seems to be more than one. Thus looking forward to oneness is madness. You can, however, look forward to not believing you are someone in a world where there seems to be more than one.

Doing that, the hope for more vanishes and thus the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Just like the night excludes the day and vice versa, spirituality excludes consciousness and vice versa. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

All experiences, regardless they are perceived to be direct, spiritual and whatnot, come from the brain, where they are fabricated to make the biological system reacts upon them as if it is a self inside a body that is having them which, therefore, must be a substantial being in a tangible world.

The brain counts on the self it has created to make this conclusion because if not, it is evident that nor the self or the world it seems to experience is real. In other words, because the self wants to survive as someone substantial, it chooses to perceive the experiences produced by the brain as tangible.

Whether this perception relates to the experiences produced by the brain in a positive or negative way does not matter. As long as it relates to the experiences as they are and not as the self would like them to be, the experience of being a someone in the world of the brain feels good. But it does not feel good if not relating to the experiences as they are, but to an idea of something better, for example a socialistic or a capitalistic world.

Nevertheless, no matter if your perception is in sync with the world of the brain or not, the result is an internal dialogue. In the case of the basic self, there is an inner conversation with someone from the world of the brain, whereas the special self has internal conversations with those who just like itself see the world as something they can change into something better (read more about that here). Both conversations seem to confirm there is more than one and that oneness, therefore, is an illusion.

Nobody, in particular, is making a dream you seem to have, and nor you or anybody else is in it. Likewise, appearing to be a substantial being in a tangible world is a fantasy made by nobody.

But it is the other way around. Oneness is formless and therefore endless, so there is no more than that which is one. Consequently, this article is an illusion and thus also the explanation that your appearance as someone in a world where there seems to be more than one is made by the brain. It is not caused by anyone as that requires more than one. In other words, you are not someone in a world where there seems to be more than one. You are not someone at all.

However, appearing to be someone in a world that is not there, it feels better to go along with the illusion as it is than trying to change it. Besides, it is so much easier to undo the belief that you are someone in a world where there seems to be more than one, when not trying to change because there is no more than that which is one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

There is no deeper meaning to be found in a game. It is solely about entertainment, and so are the thoughts you get from the brain. Should that not be your experience, you have made a perception of them that seems to have changed them. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Thoughts have no more meaning than the messages on the cards you draw in a game like Monopoly. Still, you have to follow them if you want to play the game. There is nothing you can do about that. But you can choose how to perceive them.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The basic self is not more spiritual than the special self. Neither is it better because everything that is experienced to be something in a world where there seems to be more than one is made of nothing. Experiencing nothing as something, however, can be quite fun when following the rules of the brain. Just like it is fun playing Monopoly when following its laws because they are designed to make you feel entertained.

You are of course free to leave the game and see if there is a better world somewhere or to be detached from it by staying in the middle, so you see everything passing by. But then you miss the thrill, the game is made to give you. In other words, following the rules of the brain is what makes you enjoy the game of being someone substantial in a tangible world.

Please do not piece the above together so that your experiences become meaningful. They are unexplainable because it takes more than one to experience something, and there is no more than that which is one.

The explanations in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings should, therefore, only be seen as a way to talk the language of the world where you believe to be. You could say that they are pointers. But not to that which is one, though, as that requires more than one, but to the mistaken belief that there is more than that which is one.

Consequently, Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings are not meant to be remembered. On the contrary. They are intended to be read in the same way as you read an exit sign in an entertainment park. When you are out, the sign is forgotten.

See also the articles

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

It is not necessary to be the basic self to have the belief in being someone definitive undone. But since it is in sync with the flow of thoughts as they come from the brain, it is relative to that and thus not occupied with being someone definitive. Hence it is easy to go along with a flow that undoes itself – or rather the belief that it is somebody at all. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Nobody can stop neither the basic or the special self from believing that they are somebody definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one. It is their choice to believe this, so they must make another one themselves. But one can help them in doing so by exposing, that what they perceive as something is nothing.

Science says that what we seem to feel and see consist of 99.9999999 per cent empty space. And the rest, despite that it also is empty space and just like a dream does not contain anything substantial, is what we perceive as elements of matter making up a tangible world. See also the articles Where to find the bliss of ´the empty breath´ and Free to float in the void of ´the empty breath´.

To prevent the acknowledgement of this from undoing the belief in being someone definitive, the special self chooses to perceive the empty space, from which the illusion of itself is fabricated, like a big void that is full of something mysterious and powerful, cosmic consciousness or whatever it imagines will establish it has been made of something special to carry out an important assignment.

Alexius does not know, if he was a basic or special self, when he for the first time, about 50 years ago, bid welcome the enlightenment of that which is one, because he forgot to remember what and where he was (read more about that here).

The basic self, on the other hand, does not perceive the empty space it supposedly is made from to contain anything. Thus it does not perceive itself to be anything than a fantasy figure of the brain, which is just as fun as when it imagines being an action figure in the virtual world of a computer game.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

If seeing or feeling something is not perceived to confirm you as someone definitive having specific experiences, the enlightenment of that which is one is bid welcome.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

In regards to bidding welcome the enlightenment of that which is one, it does not matter if you seem to be authentic or fake, spiritual or mundane, basic or special, man or woman, stupid or bright, blissful or miserable, positive or negative, vegan or something else. As long as there is no identification with your appearance, it is all the same. To spell it out, when you have absolutely no idea about what and where you are, the enlightenment of that which is one is bid welcome.

This is not an experience, nor a realisation. Oneness can neither be experienced or realised since that calls for more than one. Consequently, there is no way to know what you get by bidding welcome the enlightenment of that which is one. Actually, what you believe to be is does not get anything. On the contrary, it is abruptly terminated, so nothing graciously falls into the formlessness of oneness.

It most likely scary when you believe to be someone definitive, which you do – otherwise, you could not read this article. No worries, all duality hacks except the enlightenment of that which is one have a more gentle approach to undoing the belief that you exist because you experience that. The undoing of that belief is done over time and in the process, the foolish belief amuses you.

The empty breath, which you can read about in hack #4.5 ´The empty breath´ and the bliss of not believing to be someone is all about that. Should you prefer to skip reading about it and go straight to learning to connect with it, check instead hack #4.4 Uncontrolled speed leads to a state of not-knowing.

The enlightenment of that which is one you can read about in hack #5-7.1 From the inner senses through a black hole into that which is one.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #4.2 The basic self versus the special one, which is still in the process of being written.

Trackbacks

  1. […] When applying one or more of the duality hacks, you will slowly but surely have the belief in being someone definitive undone, while at the same time enjoying this belief. In other words, you can have your cake and eat it too, which you can read more about in Oneness is pointless. […]

  2. […] you want to go on as if you are someone in a world defined by time and space, you have to do it – read more about that here – as otherwise there is nothing to acknowledge you as someone at […]

  3. […] for it to live in. But if the self wants to appear as someone definitive, it has to endorse it – read more about that here – as otherwise there is nothing definable to confirm its existence as someone […]

  4. […] for it to live in. But if the self wants to appear as someone definitive, it has to endorse it – read more about that here – as otherwise there is nothing definable to confirm its existence as someone […]

  5. […] for it to live in. But if the self wants to appear as someone definitive, it has to endorse it – read more about that here – as otherwise there is nothing definable to confirm its existence as someone […]