No experience is real, but that which makes it possible to experience it is

In the context of the world what you experience in this image is not real. Yet it is possible to experience something unreal because you are real. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

In the context of the world what you experience in this image is not real. Yet it is only possible to experience something unreal because of that which is real. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Even though Alexius is to be compared to one who is enlightened by that which is one, he has not experienced this enlightenment. It is not possible to experience that which is one, because to experience something requires more than one. Yet it is possible to have vague memories of it, as if Alexius is full of light.

In a world where there seems to be more than one, everything seems divided in at least two, for example Alexius and the enlightenment of that which is one. In the reality of oneness though there is no difference, because there is no more than that which is one.

The way Alexius is experiencing the world is an illusion, he is fabricating on the spot based on the idea, that it is possible to experience a world where there seems to be more than one. Yet, no illusion is imaginable without that which is real, so the experience of a world where there seems to be more than one is a positive confirmation of that which is one.

This is not to imply Alexius is part of that which is one – there are no parts – but that there is no more than that which is one. So whatever appears to be in a world where there seems to be more than one is not real. Yet it is only possible to experience something, that is not real, because of that which is. In other words, though neither the experienced or the experiencer is real, that which makes it possible to believe so is.


NOTES: