Where do the ways of Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings come from

cd530ab2-65c5-436a-a5e6-218e8bc476c8

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The way to hear or feel the vibration that Aum, Sohang and The Word of God symbolises as described in the previous article Perceiving the world as symbols of the four aspects of enlightenment – or how to have glimpses of enlightenment and especially in Life has no secrets is deduced from Alexius´ experience of hearing and feeling it. Not that he originally heard or felt this echo of oneness with the help of Aum or Sohang. It was simply given to him in his youth via devotion to serve.

But it was not before much later did he realise, that hearing or feeling this vibration is what those constantly chanting Aum or Sohang are looking for but never recognise, as they have expectations of something extremely special. Yet having recognised it himself, it was not a problem to deduce a fast way of hearing or feeling the unpronounceable vibration that Aum or Sohang symbolises.

The way to connect with the inner breath is deduced from Alexius´ experience of it. Again he did not originally connect with it in the way Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings advise you to do it – see the links in the next box. The connection was just given to him. Maybe so that he could deduce a way for you to connect with it as well.

Check out these articles, if you want to connect with the inner breath: Speed is stillness, when not detainedTake-offs to the inner breathHow to ignite take-offs to the inner breath and What does the inner breath feel like?. You can also read all of hack #4-7.4 The inner breath automatically synchs the outer and inner senses.

The ways to have inner experiences of light, music and nectar as described in the previous article Perceiving the world as symbols of the four aspects of enlightenment – or how to have glimpses of enlightenment, Alexius was told about in his youth. But most likely the teller just had second-hand knowledge of the ways, because he mainly referred to ancient scriptures, where it seems they have been mentioned in various ways.

Alexius has not read ancient scriptures or so-called spiritual books, so Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings are not based on an existing religion or philosophy, neither are they meant to be a new religion or philosophy but to undo such concepts as well as any other.

A guru, which means a teacher, is always deeply founded in the belief of being someone special in a world, where there seems to be more than one, because it requires more than one to teach somebody. In other words, a guru is no different from anybody else profiting on the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one.

A guru, which is a Hindi word for teacher, is always deeply founded in the belief of being someone specific in a world where there seems to be more than one, as it requires more than one to teach something to somebody. In other words, such a guru is no different from anybody else profiting on the belief, that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Still there may not be similar instructions to see, hear and taste glimpses of enlightenment as in Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings, because they are not based on second-hand knowledge, but on the enlightenment of that which is one – and without that you are bound to misinterpret the glimpses of it.

Most things written or said about enlightenment comes from someone who is not to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one, but instead to a guru, who is mainly interested in getting more money, power, fame and love. The teachings of such a guru are therefore not geared towards bidding welcome the enlightenment of that which is one but to follow the guru, so that he/she appears to be someone who is and has more than you. It is probably for this reason, they never really tell what their teachings are about, but instead speak in vague and mysterious ways about peace, coming from the heart and whatnot.

If you doubt what your guru says, you are told, you have not gotten it and should sign up for more – meaning you should give more money.

78047ad572250f491f6955ef5b7af561

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

The old-school gurus may speak vaguely about something called kundalini, which is supposed to make a fusion between body and spirit, so that you become full of bliss. Newer gurus have speculative teachings about living in the now, realising your self or a higher purpose. Both approaches appeal to those who want to have their feelings of inferiority replaced with feelings of spiritual grandeur, so that they can be acknowledged as someone special, who is part of something higher.

But to merge with something, be full of light, live in the now, realise your self and whatnot requires more than one. It other words, it is an experience geared for a world where there seems to be more than one. It has nothing to do with the formlessness of that which is you, because it takes someone definitive to experience or to be conscious about something.

Any experience in a world where there seems to be more than one can turn into that which is one, provided you do not try to hold onto the experience by interpreting it as bliss or something else, because that which is you is no different from the formlessness of that which is one, so it is not possible to have a specific experience unless you believe you are someone definitive.

The same of course applies to seeing, hearing, feeling or tasting glimpses of the enlightenment of that which is one, as described in Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings. That is why they distinguish between the enlightenment of that which is one and the glimpses of it. The latter is an experience in a world where there seems to be more than one – you could say it is a state of being. But the enlightenment of that which is one is not an experience, nor any kind of being. because it takes more than one to experience or be something.

All ways lead to Rome, they say, but they also lead away from Rome, so do not count on the ways suggested by the gurus promising a hypothetical better life in the future. Such ways do not point to the formlessness of oneness, but to another experience in a world defined by time and space as only such a world appears to have a future.

That which is you is not the appearance of something definitive. You are and have nothing in the the sense that you you are nothing definitive, but the formlessenes of that which is one, that is everything, as formlessness is endless. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

That which is you is not the appearance of something definitive. You are and have nothing in the sense that you are nothing definitive, but the formlessness of that which is one, that is everything, as formlessness is endless. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

For those teaching about kundalini, freedom in the now, finding your self and whatnot, it is not a problem that what they promise is just another illusion, because then their followers never get it and therefore will keep on paying money, give hugs or whatever the teacher asks for, so both of you feel, it is possible to be and have more than that which is one.

But Alexius´ Enlightened Non Teachings point to the formlessness of that which is one – and as formlessness is endless, that which is you has never been and will never be more than that which is one. In other words, my non teaching of course cannot charge you for something you already have, so they are absolutely free.


NOTE: This article is a note to the previous one Perceiving the world as symbols of the four aspects of enlightenment – or how to have glimpses of enlightenment. They are both part of hack #4-7.5 The inner senses, enlightenment of that which is one and glimpses of it.