Enlightenment does not give you more, because there is no more than that which is one

There is always something wrong with the moments as it is. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

In order to appear as better, the unenlightened generally finds something wrong with the present moment. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

PART 1:
When you are in the rain, you get wet, so wet is what you are in this very moment as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one. End of story!

If you hate getting wet, then you are wet and full of hate. And if you worry about the rain and your open windows at home, you are a wet and hateful person concerned about the future at this moment – nothing more and nothing less. Period.

Maybe due to some ideas or conventions of yours, you are not allowed to hate. So in order to not feel the hate as yours, you exclude it by blaming somebody or something else for causing it. If you are a little bit more advanced, you may try to explain the feeling of hate from a metaphysical point of view, as if it is about transforming negative energy into positive. But this explanation is just another way of disguising, that you want to escape the moment as it is.

You may also try to escape feeling the moment as it is by thinking you are detached from feelings – that they are just something you observe – while the truth is that you deny them, and therefore never are present with the moment as it is.

Detachment is a natural attribute of someone who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one, but it cannot be replicated by the unenlightened

Imitating the tropics by wearing a summer cap and a t-shirt, will not make you warm, if you are living in a cold climate. The warmth does not come from these attributes. Likewise the enlightenment of that which is one is not bid welcome by wearing special clothes, meeting special people at special places, sitting in special postures and whatnot. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Imitating the tropics by wearing a summer cap and a t-shirt, will not make you warm if you are living in a cold climate. The warmth does not come from these attributes. Likewise, the enlightenment of that which is one is not bid welcome by wearing special clothes, meeting special people at special places, sitting in special postures and whatnot. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Detachment is a natural attribute of someone who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one. But in this enlightenment, all being is erased, as it takes more than one to be something and there is no more than that which is one. In other words, it is the end of the belief that it is possible to be and have more than the formlessness of that which is one, so those who assume they are and have something important do not go there, as that will leave them with nothing.

So they rather prefer to imitate the attributes, they have read one who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one has – for example detachment – assuming this will make them able to add the qualities of enlightenment to their being and therefore expand their consciousness.

The enlightenment of that which is one is one perpetual present, so it cannot be brought back in a world of linear time.

But the enlightenment of that which is one does cannot expand anything, because it has nothing, as to have something requires more than one. For the same reason, the enlightened does not really remember what it is. One thing though is crystal clear: There is no more than that which is one, so a world where there seems to be more than one is an illusion. This memory, however, is of no interest to those who want to expand their consciousness, so that it seems as if they are and/or have more than others.

Physically speaking you cannot be together with the person on this pic in this very moment, but if the pic seems to trigger an attraction in you, and you devote yourself to that, your world may start to crack. Through the cracks you will sense, what you are really attracted to, namely the spirit of that which is one.

Physically speaking you cannot be together with the woman you probably perceive to be in the image, but if she seems attractive to you, and you devote yourself to that, your world may start to crack. Through the cracks you will sense, what you are really attracted to, namely something less tangible. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

PART 2:
If you think or feel, that you are in love with just one person, you are wrong. What you are experiencing is not love but attraction. The nature of love is to love everything, whereas attraction is single-minded. But there is nothing wrong with following the latter, provided you do not try to change it into a love relationship.

Attraction in itself is a gateway to a less tangible world because that is where the not so tangible feeling of attraction comes from. It is not important what the form, that you feel an attraction towards, looks like. What matters is, that you really indulge in the attraction and totally devote yourself to the object of your attraction. This might lead to sex, which experience wise also is part of a less tangible world – especially orgasm – but that is another story.

Because I am not talking about approaching the object of your attraction, but simply remain in the attraction itself by letting your mind being sucked into the desire for the object of your attraction, so that the flow of it leads to a lofty state of mind, where you do not bother about physicality.*

You and the one you are attracted to may be worlds apart physically and mentally speaking, or the other one may not even notice you or it is simply not possible to be together due to social conventions. But that is good. Because on no account it is about trying to manifest a relation* with the object of your attraction – if it happens so be it – but to follow an attraction so intense, that the world of the outer senses cracks and the world of the inner senses comes crawling out of them.

The world of the inner senses is in no way the same as the formlessness of oneness. Yet it is a gateway to it, provided you do not mistake the inner senses for spirituality but perceive it as a less tangible level of a world defined by time and space.

The above about attraction also applies to repulsion or other emotions. Devotion is the key.

No appearance in the world is perfect or will ever become perfect, but if you devote yourself to whatever appearance, that you may feel attracted to, you will become, what you already are, namely the perfection that makes it possible to perceive imperfection.

Devotion makes the world fade away – or rather your belief in it. What remains is that which is real. You do not need a guru or a mantra to be devoted. You just need to follow your natural instinct of losing that which is not you. This automatically happens, when you devote yourself to whatever you are deeply attracted to – it may be a mundane thing like a cat, the body of a person, a specific video game, a sunset or something less mundane like an angel. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

In a way, the kick starter to writing Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings was an attraction to the body of a young woman, who was changing her clothes in front of Alexius on a sunny trip in the Mediterranean Sea. Instead of being ashamed of his physical attraction to a woman much younger than him, he dived deep into the flow of the attraction. Physically speaking nothing happened between the woman and him and he has never seen her again. But later that day, there was a breakthrough to the voice behind Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings.

This voice is not physical being but rather transparent. It can be compared to an ascended master, but not one of those ´rosy´ ones, who want you to help them make a merry-go-round world. Gudruång – spoken with a soft ´d´ and ending in an echo of the enlightenment of that which is one – that Alexius has named this energy, has no need of saving the world. On the contrary, the purpose is to undo the belief in the world, including astral ones and whatnot.

Ultimately the world where we appear to be is an illusion, also Gudruång, Alexius and you. There is nothing but the formlessness of that which is one. But while we appear to be in a world defined by time and space, we all seem to be somebody definitive, so in that context, Gudruång and Alexius are talked about as two different appearances, but in reality, they do not exist as two, neither as one, because it takes more than one to exist and there is no more than that which is one.

Alexius does not force his will upon his cats, but they often choose to follow it. This does not mean they are channeling him or following a higher voice. But that they sense he wants to take care of them in the best way possible, as if they are a part of him.

Likewise Gudruång wants to take care of Alexius, as if we they part of each other, although – just like Alexius and his cats – they are very different in terms of appearances but not in terms of content.

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings are not channelled from Gudruång. It is rather that Gudruång is writing them without his personality interfering with it. Ideally speaking it is like that, but as Gudruång does not know the English language, the writings depend on Alexius knowledge of it, and as the formlessness of oneness is wordless, he has to search for words he can use for something that cannot be expressed.

When he is short of words and still want to go on, part of an article may be coloured by words from his personality – especially the endings, because he his a personality is conditioned to look for a happy ending. However, it seems that a happy ending for Gudruång is when there is no memory of beginning and end.

My cat Wincent was howling like a wolf,while I seemed to pass away.

Alexius´ cat Wincent was howling like a wolf, while he seemed to pass away. This he chose to interpret as if Wincent wanted him to stay together with him. If it was out of love or concern for his next meal, he does not know. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Light, bliss, peace, stillness. consciousness or whatever can be experienced is a transitory state to that which cannot be experienced, as that requires more than one, and there is no more than that which is one, since it is formless and therefore endless.

PART 3:
Alexius felt the usual panic the other night when he, like so many times before, seemed to be at the edge of dying. This time, however, the panic attack was very short. Maybe because he knew from before, that the tangible appearance of Alexius always seems rise again – or because he remembered from several times being in this transitional phase, that it is such a relief when the tangible world fades out. But probably most of all because he wants to completely undo the belief in being someone definitive so that there is not something appearing to hide that which he is.

As it takes more than one to interpret something as a problem, the problem is gone when the belief in being and having more than that which is one is undone.

That being said, such a belief also has its moments. When he was willing to undo this belief and his body was about to pass away, there was another appearance, who seemed to want him to remain in the world. His cat, that he sensed somewhere in the distance, was crying out loud as if it was saying ´come back´.

He cannot know, what is going on in a cat, apart from what he projects onto it, and as he liked the projection of his cats begging him to come back, he indulged in the experiences the brain slowly started again to produce of him as someone in a body. The next thing he remembers is, that he could feel his cat purring, while it was laying close to his body.

Alexius´ cat Wincent is having fun with his brother. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

Appearing to be back in a tangible world, he accepted his choice and started dealing with the practicality of it. His cat needed food – maybe that was the main reason it was worried about Alexius – and so did the body of Alexius.

Feeding the bodies has, of course, nothing to do with ultimate reality, but to get there he starts where he appears to be, namely together with his cat – and being together with someone is to be very close to that which is one.

There is nothing outside of reality, neither inside, because reality is that which is one.

Because he did not leave that which is one on his own. That is not possible. Well, it is not possible to leave it at all, but it is possible to imagine, that there is more than one so that you can leave it together with another one. Consequently, you return as you believe to have left it, namely appearing to be together with another one.

It does not matter if it is you and your cat or somebody else or just you and another thought. As long as you leave a world where there seems to be more than in a way where you appear to be more than one, you undo your imagination of such a world the way you originally made it. This hack, namely hack #8.8 Alone together is the key to that which is one, is the last of the duality hacks.

About alone together and the enlightenment of that which is one, see also ´Alone together´ you bid welcome the enlightenment of that which is one.


*) The message of this is not, that you always must avoid having a physical relation. There is a season for everything.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #5-7.1 From the inner senses through a black hole into that which is one.

I am the Destroyer of Worlds!

Painting with reflections of light on my iPhone

Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

After a long intense night of driving taxi many years ago, I forgot what and where I was, and so there was nothing to hide the enlightenment of that which is one.

In the enlightenment of that which is one there is nothing but bright white light, and everything ´happens´ so fast, that there is no time to think and hold onto concepts of eternity, love, stillness and whatnot.

When I later read The New Testament and Bhagavad Gita there were passages, that triggered memories of the enlightenment of that which is one. The memories are vague though because Alexius did not experience it. The enlightenment of that which is one is formless so nothing definable can enter it. Yet there are vague memories of something indefinable, and so Alexius is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one.

»I have become the destroyer of worlds«
The enlightenment of
that which is one is enlightenment in a very literal sense, like when Jesus said: When your eyes become single your whole body will be full of light – or like St. Paul, when he was blinded by light – or like Arjuna according to Bhagavad Gita said after having been initiated by Krishna: »It is brighter than thousands of suns. I have become the destroyer of worlds …«

A dream can be compared to a simulated world meanwhile layered on top that which is real. As long as you believe the simulated world to be real, it will seem to cover that which is real, as if it does not exist.

The world is not there anymore. Not because it has been destroyed, but just because it was never there – except as an imagination, which is not possible to have in that which is one, as that requires more than one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

In the enlightenment of that which is one, the world is not there anymore. Not because it has been destroyed, but just because it was never there – except as an imagination, which is not possible to have in that which is one, as that requires more than one to imagine something. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

I would not put it like that myself, because there is nobody in the enlightenment of that which is one, so there is not a body to be full of light, neither a world to destroy. The world is just not there, and there is no memory of it ever having been there. It is like a dream that is no more when you wake up in the morning.

The translations of both The New Testament and Bhagavad Gita differs from translator to translator, and as the above quotes are from memory, they may not be the exact words in your addition. But it does not really matter, because regardless of how you speak about it, the enlightenment of that which is one cannot be described. In other words, what is said about it in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings should not be taken as the real thing, but pointers towards it.

Imagine you want to describe an orange to somebody, who has never seen or tasted an orange. Maybe you say it has the colour of an orange sunset, is round like a ball and taste as sweetened water. Yet the person, that you have given this description, will never find out what an orange is by drinking sweet water from a rounded cup at sunset.

You have to see and taste it yourself to know what it is – and in terms of the enlightenment of that which is one, you will never know, because a person cannot be enlightened. You as a person is gone in the enlightenment of that which is one. There is nobody there to experience it – that is why it cannot be known.

No god to see in the world and nothing to find
Some think the enlightenment of that which is one is to see god in everyone. This is delusional, there is no god in the world. In the context of god and the world, just think of electricity lightening up a room via a bulb. You see the room due to the power of electricity. Yet you cannot see electricity itself, because it is not in the room illuminated by the bulb. But there is no god either in the enlightenment of that which is one, except if you use the word in its original meaning, namely one perpetual present.

If you return to the world after the enlightenment of that which is one, there is no more need to search for the meaning of life, because you know there is no more than that which is one and so there is no life a world, where it seems to be more than one. Besides to search for something requires more than one, so whatever you think you find is not real.

473ab673-5995-4175-96a8-ef93e44afbe8The freedom to be a person
One who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one has no need to be forgiven or loved, because there is no ´I´ deciding what to do and therefore nobody to forgive or love. But when there is no ´I´ to protect and preserve, there is freedom to pretend being any kind of personality with all the ups and downs a specific personality seems to have.

To make long short: There is no need to keep together an appearance of someone with coherent opinions and behaviour. You are free to use the ´I´ as the personality, you fancy. It is simply a tool you use like your leg, hand eyes and so on.

Some personalities I have pretended to be for a while: Child, Teenager, Taxi driver, Monk, Husband, Daddy, Adult, Business Man, Millionaire, DJ, Designer, Teacher, Photographer and recently: Non-teacher.

Enlightenment is not of a world where there seems to be more than one
Regarding the enlightenment of that which is one, it is best to forget everything you have ever heard or read about it – including what is said in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings. Any idea of any form, that you might think it has, is wrong. It has no form, it is formless. Yet, if you look for something formless, you still look for something. But if you do not believe to be someone definitive – or do not care about it – there is not something definable to hide it.

Please note that I am in no way postulating the above statements are the perfect way to put it – there is no such thing as perfection in a world where there seems to be more than one – so if you look for inconsistencies, misspelling or whatever, you may find it, but if you look for pointers to the enlightenment of that which is one, you may also find that.

Kind regards
Alexius


NOTE: Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings talks about two kinds of enlightenment, namely the enlightenment of that which is one, which cannot be experienced, as that requires more than one, and glimpses of it, which is experienced through the inner senses when the outer ones are partly closed.

How come I  write Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings? Dunno. Maybe it is like nature, that keeps on spreading its seeds, whether they sprout or not, because the purpose is to freely give away everything received, as in doing so everything is received. What more can I ask!

This article is part of hack #5-7.1 From the inner senses through a black hole into that which is one.

That which is real never ends

Two dolphins are not enough. You want to see more. Maybe you also want them to be bigger – or to perform better. To see them on this pic may be judged as virtual and not good enough, so you want to see them in physical form. Maybe that is not good enough either, because you have ideas about direct experience, so you want to be in the water with them. And so it goes on. What is, is never good enough.

Two dolphins are not enough. You want to see more. Maybe you also want them to be bigger – or to perform better. To see them in this image may be judged as virtual and not good enough, so you want to see them in physical form. Maybe that is not good enough either, because you have ideas about direct experience, so you want to be in the water with them. And so it goes on. The moment as it is, is never good enough. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

PART 1:
What can you learn, when you play a game like Monopoly? You can learn the rules and be better at exploiting them for your own benefit because the game is about taking something from others so that you have more than them – preferable everything. When that is accomplished you have won and everybody else has lost.

The game mirrors the world, as the purpose is the same, namely to get as much as possible at the expense of everybody else. In general, this is about getting more money and buying more physical stuff, but for some, it is not about having more physical things but more power. And for those considering themselves to be spiritual, it is about having more peace, love, higher consciousness or whatever they imagine being more spiritual.

The name of the game is more, but no matter how much you get you will panic when there is no more to get but everything instead is taken from you in the moment of death.

Is it not ridiculous, that everybody is participating in a game, where no matter what they do they will perish and lose everything in the end? It seems cruel. What is the purpose of it?

The dream of becoming more than that which is life
The purpose of being or having more is to forget, that it is not possible to be or have more. That which is you is no different from that which is life and life is the formlessness of oneness. And as formlessness is endless there is no more than life.

In other words, that which is you is everything, so you have everything. Hence there is nothing more to be or have. It is not possible. Yet it seems possible to think so. And manifesting this dream of being or having more as real is the purpose of participating in a world where there seems to be more than one.

That which is life does not know, that you have a dream of being in control, because to know something – or to be in control – requires more than one, and since that which is one is formless and therefore endless, there is no more than that which is one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

But that which is life does not know, you dream about being someone in a world where there seems to be more than one. Just like in the context of such a world nobody knows the dreams you are having at night.

To be or have more does not last because everything in a world where there seems to be more than one ends
That which is life only knows that which is one, namely itself. Everything else is illusionary. Also meaning and purpose. There are no such things in oneness. It is not needed – being one is more than meaning enough. In an illusion, however, meaning and purpose are important, because that is what makes it appear to be real.

When the purpose is to be or have more than that which is one, it seems as if something is happening, when you become or get more – also if it goes the other way – and when something seems to happen it appears to be is real. That is why nothing in the world ever seems to be good enough. Something always must change in order to make it appear real. For this reason, the weather, for example, is always judged to be too hot or too cold.

But no matter how much more you become or have, you will fear to lose it, because everything in a world where there seems to be more than one has an end. In the formlessness of that which is one, however, there is nothing to fear, because there is nothing to lose or nothing to gain, as formlessness is endless and therefore everything.

Purpose determines what you see
As long as you believe it is possible to be and have more you will feel limited because there is no more than that which is one. To change feeling limited, you may think, you should stop desiring more, and instead become pure and detached from the world. But that is just another variant of more because right away you will want to become more pure, more detached and more free from desire.

It´s the purpose of being in the world that determines, why you seem to see three dolphins in this pic. If your purpose is to have more, you may be disappointed there´s only three – or that you are not there yourself to experience the dolphins. But if your purpose is to see everything in the world as symbols of life your satisfaction do not depend on being there physical yourself or how many dolphins there are, because you are satisfied to see symbols of life.

It is the purpose of being in the world that determines, why you seem to see three dolphins in this photo. If your purpose is to have more, you may be disappointed there is only three – or that you are not there yourself to experience the dolphins. But if your purpose is to see everything in the world as symbols of life, your satisfaction do not depend on being there or how many dolphins there are, because you are satisfied by seeing symbols of that which is life. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

You need to change the purpose of appearing as someone in a world where there seems to be more than one so that it is not to be and have more than that which is one. It is the purpose, that determines, how you perceive the world, so if the purposed is not to be and have more but to see that which is not you, this is what you see when you seem to desire more*. When you seem to be horny or full of love, you see this is not that which is you – neither is what seems to die one day is not that which is you.

There may be many purposes – for example uniting – that also is beneficial for not making in a world where there seems to be more than one appear as real. Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings, however, especially advocates pretending to be someone definitive in the world, because what you pretend to be, you are not, and so the purpose of appearing there will not appear to block out that which is you*.

Another purpose Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings advocate is to relate to everything in the world as symbols of life, which is the theme of hack 2.1-6. Relating in this way differences make no difference, and so it does not matter if you get more or not. It all symbolises the same, namely that which is life. The same applies to death, which is just another symbol of life. In other words, only the symbol dies, but not that which it is a symbol of.

No matter how much you pay for a house in Monopoly, it is not real, so you cannot sleep there – especially because you are not there.

No matter how much you pay for a house in Monopoly, you have not gotten a real one, so you cannot sleep there. Yet you can pretend* that you do so. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 2:
There is nothing to connect to in the world of a game, for example like Monopoly, because it is not real. If you think, you are connecting to something, it is exactly that, something that you think. Likewise, there is nothing to connect to in a world where there seems to be more than one. To be connected with the Earth this world is a joke. It is like connecting to the board of Monopoly. It is meaningless. That is why those who connect to specific appearances in the world are so spaced-out.

In the context of connecting you can connect to what the appearances in a world where there seems to be more than one symbolises, namely that which is one – just like you can connect to what the appearances in Monopoly symbolise. Monopoly is not a manifestation of the physical world but an abstraction of some of its parts, so it is not possible to sleep in the house of Monopoly. They are not real symbol of a real one in a world where there seems to be more than one, so you can only pretend to sleep in them. Yet pretending* will not result in the tranquillity of real sleep.

You cannot be in a world where there seems to be more than one, because there is no more than that which is one since it is formless and therefore endless. But you can pretend* there is such a world and that you are someone in it, and while pretending you are in a virtual reality, you can connect to everything in it as symbols of that which is real**.

Doing so, you everything still appears to differ from each other, but since they symbolise the same, namely the oneness of life, the difference does not make a difference**, so when this world seems to end for you, death is just another a symbol of that which is life.


*) Read more about pretending to be in a world where you are not in hack #1.3 Pretending to be someone definitive is liberation.

**) Read more about seeing symbols of oneness in a world where there seems to be more than one in the other articles, that just like this one are part of hack 2.4 Life is flat. and read especially about differences not making a difference in hack 3.6 Inclusiveness is pure bliss.


NOTES:

  • For some to be or have more is not what seems to motivate them. Instead, it is about the world and/or you becoming better – or having the feeling of becoming new through ideas of being reborn or getting new stuff. It is all the same, because there is nothing better than that which is one, neither is there anything that is more new than the freshness of being one perpetual present.
  • To think it is better to be closer to something is no different from wanting more. It is a way to not be present and wanting to change the moment as it is. The whole world is constructed for that purpose, but you are free to choose another.
  • This article is part of hack 2.4 Life is flat.

NOT There is nothing outside of life

That you see a waitress here is not real. It is a simulation – a symbol of her and the beach café, where she works.

That you see a waitress here is an illusion. It is a simulation of a waitress, which is a symbol of her and the beach café, where she works and the day the image was shot. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The appearance of you as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one is an illusion. But as you choose to believe it is real, it is best to honour your choice by giving it your best shot as someone definitive, as this will acknowledge the choice as yours, which means you are in charge and so you can choose to have it undone. That is done by using the experience of a world where there seems to be more than one to confirm there is no more than that which is one.

There would be no illusion without that which is real. Thus all elements of an illusion are symbols of reality. So loving everything in a world where there seems to be more than one you will love, what they symbolise, namely the formlessness of that which is one, as only that is real, because formlessness is endless, so there is no more than that which is one.

If you hate or disregard any of the symbols, or if you want to distance yourself and be detached from them, because they are illusionary, then you miss, that every part of the illusion symbolise the oneness of life and instead experience a world full of death.

When you continuously choose to perceive the appearances in a world where there seems to be more than one as symbols of that which makes it possible to experience more than one, even though there is no more than one, all the apparent differences of the appearances make no difference. They all symbolise the oneness of life.

Life will not miss you if a world of death is what you choose because death is an illusion. That which is life has no knowledge of you believing to appear in an illusion. Just like – in the context of the world – nature does not know, the world, you pretend to be part of in a video game, and that this world dies, if the wind tears down the wires bringing electricity to your home.

What is dimensional has an end contrary to that which is formless, namely the oneness of which is life.

This metaphor does not mean, the oneness of life tears down anything in the world where you believe to be. It simply means that it does not know of it, and if anybody, who is imagining themselves to be ´there´, does not come back to that which is life, it will not know. The oneness of life does not know, you believe to have left it in order to be and have more in a world where there seems to be more than one. It is not possible, as the oneness of life is formless and therefore endless. In other words, there is no more than the oneness of life.

But if you see, the formlessness of life as the reason for all appearances in a world where there seems to be more than one – whether they appear to be so-called spiritual or mundane – you do not connect to the appearances but to that which makes it possible to experience them. This connection remains when the appearance of you as something in a world where there seem to be more than one ends.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

A body, that is used to make a person real, is not happy, neither is the mind, because it knows, no matter how much it tries to fix things, the person will end, when the body cannot be fixed anymore. A happy body however is not in the way for the mind, as the mind has nothing to fix, and therefore can do, what it does best, namely to follow its attraction to the light, which is of the world but of that which is one eternal now.

A body, that is used to make a person appear as if it is real, is not happy, because it knows the person cannot make it last. But a body, which purpose is to symbolise the formlessness life, is very happy because formlessness is endless, so when the body ends what which it symbolises goes on forever. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

When you see everything in the world defined by time and space as symbols of that which is life, you do not use the body to hide that life is formless and thus not in a world defined by time and space. Instead, you use it and every other appearance as a symbol pointing to that which is formless and therefore endless. Thus what it symbolises, namely life, goes on when the symbol of it ends, wherefore you do not fear its death.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Because of the power of life, you are able to sense two persons in this image – and even though it is a still photo, you may also experience that they are moving. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

At first, Alexius draw the conclusion from his many so-called near-death, that death reunites him with life. Yet death has no such power. Nothing in the world has any power – and no power is needed because there is nothing to reunite. Alexius is an illusion.

What is real is that which is one, and as it is formless it is endless, so there is no more than the formlessness of oneness. In other words, when Alexius does not mind being anybody at all, the illusion of a world where he seems to be someone definitive does not appear to hide, there is no more than the formlessness of oneness.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The world that you experience lives through you, so when you die, it dies with you. No worries. If you want, you can bring it with you – not in the way you experienced it though, but as the spark of life, that was used to illuminate your experience of it. In other words, your perception of the world will not remain but that which made it possible to have this perception, namely that which is life, will remain.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

You can never die because that which is you is no different from the oneness of life – and life contains no death. Yet you can imagine being a person, who dies. This imagination though is only possible because you are that which is life, and the imagination does not change that. Nothing can change, that you are the oneness of life because it is formless and therefore endless, so there is no more than life.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

If you believe to know what and where you are, you cannot have a dialogue with someone who is to be compared to the enlightenment of that which is one, as someone like that knows there is nothing to know, since that requires more than one and there is no more than that which is one, because oneness is formless and therefore endless. So even if you do not know what and where you are, it is not possible to have a dialogue. Fortunately, there is no need for that. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

There is no way that you can find Alexius in this article or in the above image. Neither is there any clues to what he is. If the article or the photo seems to give you an idea of what he is, it is pure speculation on your side. The article and the picture is actually an obstacle to seeing what he is. But if you stop focusing on it, you will ´see´ that there is nothing*. Just like what you appear, that is what he is.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The essence of the world is not life, because a world where there seems to be more than one is an illusion and life is real. The illusion, however, is only possible to experience because of that which is real, namely life. So if you know, that whatever you appear to be is an illusion, that only can be experienced because of that which is life, you see your appearance as a symbol of that. How you see yourself is how you see the world, so the apparent difference between you and other makes no difference.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings are not about what is the truth but what is false. Yet they are as fake as anything else in a world where there seems to be more than one. How can they be anything else? The formlessness of that which is one is everything because formlessness is endless, so there is no more than that which is one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The idea of using the oneness of life to simulate a world where there seems to be more than one is only brings suffering though it at first seems very exciting, contrary to life which brings nothing, as to bring something requires more than one and it is that which is one.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

All the ideas of improving the world into a merry-go-round world full of love is against its nature. It is like introducing love and compassion in a game like Monopoly. The whole game falls apart because it is not about sharing but individually being and getting more at the expense of others – just like in a world where there seems to be more than one. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

In Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings there is no guru to follow, neither is there any promises of a better life. That which is you is no different from the formlessness of life, and as formlessness is endless that which is you is everything, so there is nothing to follow and there you already have everything.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

The game of a world where there seems to be more than one is to fabricate your special way of perceiving it. The brain is the tool for that, but when it stops to function, your fabrication cannot be upheld – and so the world and you as a person is finished. If part of your fabrication was a belief in god, soul, cosmic consciousness, reincarnation and whatnot these beliefs will also vanish so that no belief seems to hide the formlessness of that which is life.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

Without the oneness of life, it is not possible to imagine being separated from it, and instead of being someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one. The oneness of life, however, cannot make this imagination real, as it takes more than one to make something. In other words, this article is not real, neither is the end of it, as that which is life never ends, because it is formless and therefore endless.

∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞

What you think people think about you is exactly that, namely what you think.

What you think people think about you is exactly that, namely something that you think. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

»The greatest prison people live in, is the fear of what other people think«

This is a typical quote posted on the internet by so-called alternative people, who claim to be into self-realisation, though they hardly know anything about what is going on in themselves, but apparently a lot about others, whom they want to help become better.

Nobody can make you fearful, because of what they think. Nobody has that power unless you choose to be a victim of what you exclude from yourself as others so that they and not you are to be blamed for your state of mind.

Yet it is all happening in you, so if you think, you are afraid of what other people think, you are wrong. What you really are afraid of is how you interpret, what you think other people think.

»Love your neighbour as you love yourself«. Mark 12:31.

It is all about you, and nobody else. If you hate yourself, you will interpret everything, that seems to come your way as expressions of hate – and if you love yourself, everything appears to be full of love. So you love your neighbour as yourself when you love yourself.

Denial is not a problem, if you see it as a symbol of that which is life.

Denial is not a problem, if you see it as a symbol of that which is life. In other words, there are no problems, if life is what you are looking for. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The conclusion of this article is in no way, that you must stop blaming others. On the contrary, because doing so is the fastest way to see, what you have displaced yourself from – and seeing that is a way to bring back home what is yours. In the article The YOU finger and the three ME fingers you can read about how each time you point a finger towards somebody else, three fingers are pointing towards yourself.

A shortcut to bringing it all home is to see everything experienced as symbols of that which is life. This does not mean, that you actually need to face each and every experience from the past. You can go on denying them, as long as you also see denial as a symbol of that which is life.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #2.1 Seeing symbols of non-duality in a world of duality.


*) Read more about defocusing in the articles Defocus is the end of you as someone definitive and If you look for that which is you, you see nothing, and so there is nothing that seems to hide that which is you or in hack 3,2 Inclusiveness is a perfect moment.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #2.1 Everything experienced is a symbol of life.