[√] You are not here because what you believe to be is a ghostly image of nothing

This image and this article may be fragments of a superhologram. If so they are basically not different from other fragments in the world.

What if this image and article are fragments of a superhologram? Wise people like to ask a question like that because it seems to imply they are part of something greater and not just a figment of nothingness. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

As that which is one is formless and therefore endless, it is not possible to be in a world where there seems to be more than one, nor is it possible to be anywhere else, as it takes more than one to be something, and there is no more than the formlessness of oneness. In other words, what and where you believe to be is not there. According to the brain, however, it receives frequencies from a sensory system, that confirm us to be somebody substantial in a tangible world where there seems to be more than one.

But since there is no more than that which is one, this experience produced by the brain of a tangible world with us as substantial beings is a deception – including the story of the big bang. Also the recent findings of science that seems to suggest that as our visual system is sensitive to sound frequencies, and our sense of smell in part is dependent on what is called cosmic frequencies, and the cells in our bodies are sensitive to a broad range of frequencies, we are a portion of a holographic domain of consciousness and thus part of something greater.

It is more to the point when aspects of Pribram’s holographic model of the brain is put together with Bohm’s theory. For if the concreteness of the world is but a secondary reality and what seems to be ´there´ actually is a holographic blur of frequencies, and if the brain also is a hologram and only selects some of the frequencies out of this blur and mathematically transforms them into sensory perceptions, what becomes of objective reality?

Put quite simply, everything experienced is an illusion. We are ´receivers´ that seem to float through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequencies, that literally speaking is non-existing. Yet a physical world in 3D appears to be rendered from this nothingness that we as receivers choose to experience as real, and doing so we affirm ourselves to be authentic as well.

Yet the experience of a physical world is only one out of many, it could also be an astral world that one seems to extract from the sea of nothingness and project ghostly images into it via its simulated superhologram, so nothing appears to be something.

To resume, the whole world – whether it seems physical or spiritual – is a fantasy made to fool you into believing, you are a physical being with a sensory system, that receives frequencies from a world outside of you and thus ratifies you to be someone substantial in a tangible world. Read more about that here.

That somebody is making this fantasy is also a fantasy. It is wishful thinking by those who want to be ratified as a conscious being. Just like nobody makes a dream, nobody makes the fantasy of a world where there seems to be more than one – and nobody is in it.

Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The so-called fact that the brain bases the experiences it produces on the info it receives from our sensory system is part of the story it composes to make us believe, we have these experiences that seem to confirm we are somebody in a world where there seems to be more than one. For those who see through this, the brain has another story, namely that although any experience is made from out of nothing, someone is conscious about this illusion of something.

The brain likes are proud of this story because to be conscious of something, there must be more than one and it is all about hiding, there is no more than that which is one. And also that consciousness is just another a deception of the brain, meant to confirm itself and its creations as real.

Nor science, religions or anything else has been able to explain the existence of the universe. The reason for that is very simple, it does not exist.

This explanation is, of course, a load of guff, because it takes more than one to explain something, and there is no more than one since it is formless and therefore endless. In other words, if our appearance as somebody in a world where there seems to be more than one were explainable, the brain and its fantasy of the of us as separated beings in such a world would be real, and oneness unreal.


  • The above consists of old and new notes that Alexius has compiled into an article. Some of the sentences may partly be from articles written by others about holographic theories. He cannot remember what is what. No worries, it is all nothing appearing to be something explaining what cannot be understood, namely that there is nothing but that which is one!
  • This article is part of hack #4.1 Eyes cannot see.

Pretending is a way out of duality

By pretending to be a person in a world, that is not there, you know, that the one pretending is not there.

By pretending to be someone definitive in a world of duality, you know, that the one pretending it is not there. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

In old religious scripts from India, which in many ways are the basis of the Western New Age philosophies, the world is called Maya, which is a Hindi word for illusion. You could, therefore, say that the basis of both eastern and western alternative thinking is, that the world of duality is an illusion. And as this is also the basis of Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings, everything you believe to read in them or anywhere else is an illusion.

In other words, there is no truth to find in a world of duality, whether you look high or low, inside or outside, in the past, now, future or whatnot. There is nothing but deceptive experiences in a world of duality, which includes your interpretation of this statement.

Within the context of duality, there is one important difference between Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings and most teachings of so-called spirituality. They have a set of rules for what is right and wrong and the one and the only way to truth, bliss, heaven and whatnot, whereas Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings do not claim to have the truth or any help to offer.

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings simply suggest, that as long as you believe to be someone in a world of duality, this belief can be undone by instead pretending to be there, because what you pretend to be you are not, and so you cannot be labelled as someone definitive. Hence there is not something that appears to hide the formlessness of that which is you.

NOTE: This article is part of hack #1.3 Pretending to be someone definitive is liberation.