No belief can survive inclusion, because a belief is based on excluding something

Separation is make-believe. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 1:
If you are into giving or sending love, you believe separation is the reality, as without division there would be no ´you´ to give or send love to ´others´. The same applies to be empathic with others or some other do-gooder idea. Any kind of being excludes something, so that you can become someone, who makes a difference by generously giving to those you judge to be or have less than you.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

As it takes more than one to believe in something, it is not possible to believe in anything in the reality of that which is one, unless imagined there is more than that which is one

The imagination of this can be compared to covering your eyes with your hands, so there does not appear to be anything else than the fantasy. To this illusion all that is needed is to take away your hands.

Believing Santa Claus is bringing gifts to all good children one night a year does not change anything. The gifts are coming from your parents. Likewise believing that it is possible to be and have more than which is one is not gonna make it real. Yet this childish belief hides the obvious, namely that there is no more than that which is one.

To have something specific is not possible, as there is no more than the formlessness of that which is one. But to have everything is not just possible, it is the reality of oneness, because formlessness is endless.

Any belief is an exclusion of that which is one, as it takes more than one to believe something. The inclusion of a belief, however, undoes the idea that there is more than that which is one. In other words, no need to stop giving or sending love or anything else you believe to be real, as the inclusion of this nonsense undoes the value you attributed to give and receive love and therefore that it is possible to be separated from that which is one.

Taking everything personal is a way way to keep distance and therefore to confirm separation and that you are something special. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Taking everything personal is a way to enhance the belief in being someone definitive, who is separated from a world experienced to be outside of what you believe to be. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 2:
If you judge for example the wind to have the power to change your state of mind, you believe to be a person in a world where there seems to be more than one and the wind to do something personally to you, even though it does not know you. This applies as well to the other appearance that looks like you. They do not know you – neither themselves, because there is no self. Hence it is make-believe that something personal has ever been done to you.

The sun never rises or sets, because it does not move around the earth. It is the earth, that moves around the sun, but as you consider yourself to be the crown of creation, you think you are the centre of everything.

What seems to be you is a fabrication based on what you perceive to be moving around you, and as that perception is the result of what you have excluded from what you believe to be you, what is perceived to be outside of you is experienced as very personal.

Whether you perceive to give love or hate, the belief in separation is enhanced, because only if you believe that you and the receiver is separated can you perceive to give something.

Although it appears to cause much pain keeping a personality together by perceiving a personal world outside of it, you compulsively go on to judge everything as personal, because that is the way to hide the impersonal reality of that which is one.

To be a boy, you must exclude being a girl, and so defined as a boy you long for the girl you have excluded – and vice versa.The graphic is grabbed from the web.

To be a boy, you must exclude being a girl – and so defined as a boy you long for the girl you have excluded – and vice versa. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 3:
If you do not adjust to the established concepts of a world where there seems to be more than one and make sure to appear as a man when you have a penis or a woman when you have none, you are judged as a traitor to society and thus excluded from it. This separation makes both those that seem to be part of society those excluded from feeling more alive, as they mistake separation the feeling of being someone definitive for being alive.

Nobody is born a boy or a girl though. Those concepts are just like the value added to the colour of skin, age and whatnot appearing to define you as someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one are a construction of thoughts compiled to keep everybody in predefined categories, so that they are confirmed as someone definitive separated from a world defined to be outside of them. But you cannot be someone definitive, as it takes more than one to be someone, and you are that which is you is the formlessness of oneness.

You are not an American, a Russian, a Christian or a musician. You are nothing at all. It is just something you want to believe, so that you appear to be and something contrary to the formless of oneness, that has nothing, as it takes more than one to have something.

Yet it seems possible to believe that you are someone definitive and maintain that belief by following the concepts of the world. This conditioning may seem as if it is forced upon you by parents and society. But that is not so. You freely adhere to them in order to be in the rat race for being and having more than that which is one.

This is not to say, that you must stop this in order to not hide the formlessness of that which is one by the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one. As such a world is not real, you need not to change anything there, but the belief that you are there.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

What you want to hide from your personality, you exclude by projecting it onto others, so that you can be defined as better than them. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 4:
Being exclusive you appear to be the opposite of what you exclude. If you exclude what you judge to be bad, for example, you appear to be good. In other words, you are defined by what you exclude. That is the way to be somebody in a world where there seems to be more than one.

The main reason for being exclusive is that being inclusive you will not appear to be entirely correct but also mistaken, and being mistaken must be avoided at any cost in order not to be reminded of your original mistake, namely to believe in separation.

To be inclusive instead of exclusive is not complicated at all but plain simply, as all you have to do is to not exclude. If you, however, are not aware of how you continuously exclude something judged to be bad in order to make others appear as wrong and you as right, you cannot choose not to exclude and thus stop the glorification of separation.

You do not become nobody by excluding what makes you appear to be someone specific but by including it. When everything definable is included there is nothing excluded to define you as someone specific.

But when you realise that being someone definitive in a world in a world where there seems to be more than one does not have a happy ending no matter how much you exclude in order to become better, you know choosing to be exclusive is not in your own best interest and so you are ready to stop it. As that means you are all-inclusive, there is nobody but you. You are alone together with the experience of a world where there seems to be more than one.

When nothing is excluded there is no feeling of being something, neither of being alone or anything else, as there is no more than the formlessness of oneness, and it takes more than one to be something.

It does not seem to hide that which is one anymore though because it is no different from that the oneness of that which is you.

If you focus on the contrasts of this image, you probably end up deducing something and therefore conclude, you are someone definitive looking at something that you understand. But if you defocus, the contrasts disappears and there is not something to deduce and therefore nothing to understand. When you do not understand anything, you do not know what and where you are and so there is no knowledge to hide that which cannot be known, namely the formlessness of oneness. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

»Confirmation bias refers to a type of selective thinking whereby one tends to notice and to look for what confirms one´s beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts one´s beliefs.« The Skeptic´s Dictionary.

PART 5:
Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings
are written from the perspective of nobody, but as most fight hard to appear as if they are somebody, they automatically twist them into something that confirms their belief in being unique.

To make it look as if there is more than one in the world, your thoughts are constantly used fabricate an image of somebody appearing to be outside of the thoughts you have compiled to be you. In this way, specific thoughts establish you as someone thinking them and other thoughts of you meeting somebody else.

Alexius has no compassion for anybody because he sees nobody. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

When you do not believe the division of thoughts into me and them makes a difference the fabrication of you as someone definitive cannot be upheld. In other words, when the specific thoughts, that are excluded from what appears to be you in order to make it appear as if there are more than you, are included instead, there does not appear to be anybody outside of you and therefore nobody to acknowledge you like somebody.

If you want to believe, that you are unique with your own path to follow and that there is someone special only for you, you do not want the reality of that which is one, because in the formlessness of oneness nobody is unique, since it requires more than one to be unique or anything at all. In other words, there is nobody in the formlessness of oneness. Neither anywhere else, as formlessness is endless.

Hence there is no separation and thus nobody else but you. Not the limited you, that you believe to be, but that which is everything, namely the formlessness of oneness. See also hack #3.3 Phasing out the personality by not being exclusive.

Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

But as that which is everything is formless, it seems to be nothing in a world defined by time and space, so most choose to interpret not being exclusive but inclusive as a way to own one´s thoughts or to accept, as this implies they are someone definitive understanding Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings. Yet they forget, that to understand them is to not know what they are about because the formlessness of oneness cannot be known since there is no more than that which is one.

Believing to be someone specific you want to feel validated by resonating with somebody or something perceived to be like-minded.. If you find such validation in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings you have overlooked their basic message, namely that there is no more than that which is one and therefore nothing to resonate with.

When the duality hacks are applied there is nobody to understand them because they neutralise all contrasts, and without them, there is not something to perceive, neither someone to perceive anything.

What you seem to think or do only matters if you believe, you are someone specific. When you are nobody nothing matters, neither if you seem to think or do as if it does, because there is no ´I´ with the intention of manifesting itself to be somebody.

So if you had expected inclusion to be the way to something new, you have gotten it wrong. Inclusion leads to nothing. But when there is nothing, there is not something to hide there is no more than the formlessness of oneness.

The idea of living in the now is an attempt to exclude what is judged to be bad, so you can be judged as good.The graphic is grabbed from the web.


The idea of getting freedom and power from living in the now is an attempt to exclude what is judged to be bad so you can be judged as good and only that. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

APPENDIX:
There seem to be certain thoughts, that need to be avoided before you can be living in the now. according to the concepts established about the nowThis means, however, that you are not living now but later.

More to the point, you are living in the past, because the now that is supposed to come when negative thoughts and whatnot has been excluded is a result of your past ideas or doctrines about what is now and what is now, whereas in a perfect moment everything is now, since it includes everything, no matter if you are thinking of the past in a regretting or happy way, or about the future in worried or excited fashion.

Who but those, who judge others to be bad, have the need to appear as good?

In other words, the search for freedom in the now is an attempt to escape the present moment as it is by editing it and thereby avoiding its intimacy.


NOTES:

  • For the not so spiritual-minded person, the goal may be to be a bad-ass, but that is just another way of following concepts of how to become someone definitive so you can fence off the intimacy of being all-inclusive by always respond in relation to the personality you have created.
  • This article is part of hack #3.1 Inclusiveness is a perfect moment.

NOTE: This article is part of hack #3.1 Inclusiveness is a perfect moment.

The peace of that which is real

There is no Santa Claus up in the sky on a sleight full of presents to you. It is make-believe and so is the world – inclusive astral world and whatnot.The graphic is grabbed from the web

There is no Santa Claus in the sky on a sleigh full of gifts on his way to all the good the children. It is make-believe and so is a world of duality – inclusive astral worlds and whatnot. The graphic is grabbed from the web

The previous hack, hack #2.3 Life is flat, is about how a world where there seems to be more than one seems to hide that which is one. This does not mean, however, that a world where there seems to be more than one can hide that which is one. Nothing can hide it, because there is no more than that which is one since it is formless and therefore endless. Hence a world where there seems to be more than one is make-believe – just like within the context of such a world the gifts in the sleigh of Santa Claus is make-believe – and as what you believe is what you seem to see, it appears to hide non-duality.

So to speak of a world where there seems to be more than one as a layered virtual reality on top of that which is a metaphor. There is no layers on top of that which is one. That is not possible, because there is nothing outside of it.

Yet a world where there seems to be more than one only appears to be there when you wish to see more than one. Any explanation about such a world, however, is an illusion. Also that there is a way back to the formlessness of that which is one other than undoing the belief that there is more than that.

This you do not want. Just like it seems more exciting, that it is Santa Claus bringing you gifts and not your parents, the thrill of being someone special in a world where there seems to be more than one seems more appealing than the peace of that which is one, so you choose to believe the weird story of a world where there seems to be more than one. 

That is until – in the context of the Santa Claus metaphor – you stop believing there is a sleigh full of gifts, and that those gifts you get, you receive because of your parents.

In other words, the excitement you seem to experience in a world where there seems to be more than one, is only possible to experience because of that which is real, namely that which is one, and which cannot be believed, seen or experienced, as that requires more than one. That is why it is so peaceful.

To be that which is peace, and nothing else, you must give up being charged by excitement. The graphic is from the internet.

To be that which is peace and nothing else, you must give up being charged by excitement. The graphic is from the internet.

PART 2:
The peace of that which is one has no contrast, which is why it is not to be found in a world where there seems to be more than one. In such a world the experience of peace is contrasted by war in order for you to know when you are at peace. In the formlessness of oneness peace, however, is not the absence of war. It is rather the absence of a world where there seems to be more than one – or more correctly the absence of excitement.

There are lots of excitement to find in a world where there seems to be more than one, but no matter what you are excited about, you are bound to lose it – if not before then for sure when you die. So fear of losing what you have follows in the footsteps of excitement – also if you try to tone down feelings via meditation or similar techniques used to deny specific parts of a world where there seems to be more than one.

To make long short, if you want the peace, that cannot be experienced since it has no contrast, you must give up being charged by excitement that seems to come for example a new spouse, home, vacation, state of mind or whatever lights your fire, because there is no excitement in that which is one. That is why it is so peaceful.

2015/05/92665

Two or more can become one, not in the world though, but together you can undo the dream of separation. As you appear to be more than one in the world, you are more than enough to undo it. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 3:
All searching is based on the sense that something is missing, and so searching on a psychological level will enhance this sense of loss.

If you search for something, you must have forgotten that which is you, as it is no different from that which is one, and as it is formless it is endless, so that which is you is and has everything. Hence searching for something is a denial of that which is you.

In other words, you have not chosen to be a someone in a world where there seems to be more than one to reestablish that which is you. On the contrary, you want to escape it by searching for something larger than life.

Yet there is nothing larger than life. Not because it is the largest – life is smaller than a period in this article – but because there is no more than the oneness of life.

The reason scientists have not been able to find the source of life is very simple. There is no life in a world where there seems to be more than one. Such a world is to be compared to a dream, which, though only possible due to the one dreaming it, does not contain the dreamer.

Nothing in a dream is real, neither in the dream of a world where there seems to be more than one. It may seem real while the dream is going on, and it may seem as you can find something there, but you can never find anything but dreams. They, however, may seem to be larger than the oneness of life. This greatness you seem to be able to achieve in the dream, you will not give up for the peace of that which is one.

And you do not need to since there is no more than that which is one, so there is no dream and therefore nothing to give up, except the belief that there is.

When tomorrow brings you, what you are excited about it, the excitement vanishes. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

When tomorrow brings you, what you are excited about it, the excitement vanishes. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 4:
If you are new to Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings you may expect to find something exciting in them, that can be used to improve your appearance as a person in the world or to transform this person to a better and more spiritual one. If this is what you expect, you will not find what you think you need in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings, and elsewhere you will just get empty promises about a merry-go-round world to come in the future.

Peace cannot be experienced, as it is the formlessness of that which is one, and it takes more than one to experience something. So when there is no experiences, neither so-called spiritual or mundane, there is nothing to hide there is no more than that which is one.

What you need is peace, and that cannot be found. Fortunately, that is not necessary, because peace is that which is you. If this is not obvious, it may be because, you think, what you need is excitement. That is not peaceful, because whatever you get excited about, will slowly vanish. This includes so-called spiritual states. Even if something seems to remain the same, your excitement will not, as the foundation of a world where there seems to be more than one is the belief that there must be more.

What a world where there seems to be more than one is all about is the hope for more excitement, that based on past dreams is expected to be found in future appearances. When there is nothing to hope for, it is pretty boring to appear as if you are in such a world. But the more bored you are, the more you are bidding welcome the peace of that which is one.

Instead of questioning this belief, everybody joins in groups of socialism, capitalism, spirituality and whatnot hoping to find something better and lasting that will keep them forever excited. If you are in such a group, you will not like the ending of this article, because it has no more to say and no solution for you, but to undo the belief that is hiding the peace of that which is one, namely the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one.

A telly has a constructed personality, but no self or soul.

Telly has a personality, but it has no self or soul. If it seems so, it is purely make-believe. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 5:
These days it can be very dangerous to believe you have a self. Recently 12 persons died trying to snap a spectacular selfie. In the same period, eight had their self eaten by a whale – or rather their belief in being a self. So far, however, nobody has actually found this self.

It is like trying to find a self in a television. It has no self. None of the things that it broadcasts is made by itself. It does not even know who is broadcasting and what is broadcasted.

To be empty as a telly does not mean, that there are no thoughts, but that they are not considered to come from someone definitive.

Not knowing what and where you are, you are just as empty as a telly. Hence there is not something to be excited about and therefore not something to hide the peace of that which is one.

It is very seldom, that the clouds are that low like in this pic shot an early morning from my terrace, but whether I experience th beauty of it directly or not, the experience will not last.

It is very seldom, that the clouds are that low like in this photo shot an early morning from the terrace of Alexius, but whether the experience of is so-called direct or not, it will not last. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

PART 6:
Peace in a world where there seems to be more than one always comes from something, maybe from the experience of being with your spouse away from everything, being a special beautiful place in nature untouched by humans or being meditative in surroundings without noise. But no experience last, neither do any of the appearances that seem to cause the experience of peace. Silence will sooner or later be replaced by noise, and it is not possible to always be in a place experienced to be beautiful or meditative.

Peace as experience will never last. Therefore the experience of it – just like any other experience – entails fear of losing it.

As an experience of peace is based on excluding something, for example, noise, disturbing persons or thoughts, it is is based on what is absent, and so you can never have it without its opposite.

In reality, there is only that which is one, so there is nothing to experience, neither is there someone who can be disturbed, as that requires more than one. In other words, in reality, peace is not an experience but the perpetual present of that which is one.

NOTE BENE:
What you want is what you do not have, so if you presume that peace is what you want, the first step is to realise that you are fooling yourself. You cannot want peace, because contrary to the excitement it is that which is you.

But you can want not to hide peace with dreams of excitement.


NOTE: This article is part of hack #2.4 Peace of non-duality versus the excitement of duality.

Nobody in a game is real – only the player is

lowLatencyHeadTrackingIn the previous articles What is life, where does it come from, and what is the meaning? you were promised an explanation of what a person in the world is and how it is made. But that is like having to explain what Santa Claus is made of. There is no answer to this. Yet – just like you may be able to explain how come the fantasy of Santa Claus appeals to children even though it is not reasonable – you may be able to explain how come, you believe to be a person in the world by comparing this belief to the experience of the virtual world in the games from Oculus VR.

The excitement of a virtual world
The Oculus Rift Development Kit 2 is the latest development in virtual reality games. When you wear the glasses from Oculus VR, you do not see the world, as you know, but the virtual world presented to you in the glasses.

So when you turn your head down and look at your legs, you do not see your legs, as you are used to. Instead, you may see them covered by a red spacesuit. And when you look up you may see the ceiling of a spaceship, that you appear to be flying. The world you saw, before you took on the glasses, seems to be gone and replaced by a more exciting world.

Suddenly you are in a fight somewhere in space, where other pilots in other spaceships try to kill you. If you are fast enough, you kill them first – but if not, it is the end of you as a pilot in the virtual world – and the screen turns black.

stereoscopic3d

The excitement of an illusion does not last
You could say, that Oculus VR is just a replication of how a world defined by time and space is constructed in the sense, that it covers our eyes in the same way as the glasses from Oculus VR so that it seems to be the only reality. You think you are a person in its virtual world, but you are not. You are the one with the glasses on and what you appear to be in the game an illusion.

Even though virtual reality is a fabrication done via a computer, it feels tangible and therefore experienced to be real, because you move your head in the physical world to see what is up and down in the virtual world.

Just like a virtual game seems more exciting than your daily life of the world, a world defined by time and space seems more exciting than the formlessness of that which is one, where there is nothing but the peace of oneness. The excitement comes with a price though. Nothing in a world defined by time and space lasts. Therefore you will always fear loss. And contrary to the formlessness of that which is one, that has no beginning or end, you are bound to end in a world defined by time and space.

This is not a problem though, if you remember, you are the player and not the person you pretend to be in a virtual world. This person is an illusion and no matter how much it meditates or purifies itself, it will never be transformed into something real but remain as a fabrication of your fantasy.

All experiences are fabricated by the brain, and if they seem to come from inside or outside, from the heart, god, astral worlds or anywhere else is part of the fabrication. The brain, however, can only process something definable, so it cannot process the formlessness of that which is one.

If you sense the conclusion of this article, you know, that what appears to be you in a world defined by time and space is an illusion. It is not that which is you because that is the reality of that which is one, which should not come as a surprise if you are a long time reader of my non-teaching. And have you read the previous articles in hack #2.1 Everything experienced is a symbol of life you may have grabbed, that when do not believe to someone definitive in a world defined by time and space, but see your and any other appearance as a symbol of that which is real.

You cannot see the power station in your living room. Yet it is due to that, your room is illuminated by night, so that you can experience the room.

You cannot see the power station in your living room. Yet it is due to that, your room is illuminated by light so that it can be experienced in the darkness. The image is grabbed from the web.

APPENDIX:
If the world is an illusion, we – as somebody there – cannot know if there is anything else than the world. Such knowledge would also be an illusion and so would any hope. The most realistic thing – although still illusionary – is to not know and hope.

However, just like the virtual world of a video game is constructed with the help of elements from the physical world, although there are no physical elements in a virtual world, it is most likely that the illusion of the world is constructed with the help of that which is real, although it cannot be experienced in an illusion. What can be experienced though are symbols of the that which makes it possible to fabricate the illusion of the world.


NOTES:

Far from Home

This is a pic from the late evening on the island, where I stay nowadays. It would be plain stupid to wear a warm sweater, as I would do in my native country in the evening. Everything differs from the memory of life, that I have from my home.

This is an image from a late evening on the island, where Alexius stays nowadays. Everything there differs from the memory of life, that he has from his native country, where he definitely would have had to wear a warm sweater on an evening this time of the year – but it would be plain stupid to do that where he appears to be now. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The native country of Alexius is Denmark, but nowadays he mostly is an island close to Africa. So if he wants to enjoy the moment, as it appears to be there, he has to forget about the ways of Denmark, which are quite minimalistic, and instead convert to the more maximalistic way of this island. Also, he has to adapt to a new language, change to a new currency and adjust to many other things. Even though he seems to be good at that and having fun doing it, deep inside he is still Danish and feel like he is far away from home.

The premise of Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings is, that a world defined by time and space is an imagination, but as long as you believe it to be real, you better adjust its reality.

This is not to say, that Denmark is better than his new resort or the other way around. It is a metaphor to illustrate, that if you are reading this, you are not in a spiritual but a physical world. And spirituality cannot be applied to a physical world, where the currency has to be tangible. So even though that which is you actually is formless and non-dual, the reality of duality is very tangible things like food, clothes and friends are needed in order to survive.

You can, of course, choose to leave the world of duality and return to the formlessness of non-duality, but as long as you appear to be someone in a world of duality, by all means, go for the physicality of it. There is nothing to lose. That which is you is still formless and non-dual and will always be, even though it for some time appears to be far from home in a world defined by time and space.

If you long to come back home to that which is one, you believe to have left it. That is not possible, however, since oneness is formless and therefore endless, so there is no more than that which is one. Hence it is only the belief that you have left it, that needs to be undone.

When the apparent difference between what you like and dislike does not make a difference you are on the way back home to the formlessness of that which is you. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

When the apparent difference between what you like and dislike does not make a difference you are on the way back home to the formlessness of that which is you. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

If you long to come back home to that which is one, you believe to have left it. That is not possible, however, since oneness is formless and therefore endless, so there is no more than that which is one. Hence it is only the belief that you have left it, that needs to be undone.

The way home
It is very simple to return home: When you are fed up by pretending to be someone definitive, you look at the appearances, that used to amaze or disgust you, and their apparent differences do not make a difference anymore. Hence there is nothing to confirm the belief in separation and without it the experience of duality is not possible.

It is not replaced by heaven or some kind of astral world, as all contrasts like heaven and hell physical and astral world are part of duality. So it is not replaced by anything, as it takes more than one to be or have something. Yet there is no belief in duality to hide, there is no more than that which is one.

´To return home´ may not be the best way of putting it, because that which is you is not in a world of duality, so nobody is returning to non-duality. As a metaphor, you could say, that from non-duality you are streaming a fictional video with a world of duality, where you choose to identify yourself with a specific appearance, that through artificial sensors called senses feels as if it is real and having exciting experiences.

Bill Murray in Groundhog Day experiencing the same day again and again is thinking, that there is nothing to do about it. Fortunately it is just a role he is playing in a movie, so nothing needs to be done, because it is not real. It may seem so, if you do not play your part fully, so to undo the belief in the movie as real just give it your best shot as an appearance there. The image is grabbed from the web.

Bill Murray, who in the movie ´Groundhog Day´ experience the same day again and again, thinks that he is trapped But by involving himself fully in the character he appear to be, he is set free from the it. Likewise you are set free from the believe in being someone definitive, when you completely are involved in the appearance of you as someone definitive – instead of trying to be detached or in other ways distance yourself from what your appearance in a world of duality. The image is grabbed from the web.

You may have seen Groundhog Day with Bill Murray. He wakes up every morning repeating the same day until it turns out to his satisfaction, whereupon he effortlessly gets the woman of his dreams.

Regarding this article your dreams will not be fulfilled in the end though. On the contrary. All dreams must be called. When you remember to forget them, there is nothing to hide non-duality. But you will not know, that you have had a dream, where you appeared to be in a world of duality, as to know something requires more than one, and non-duality is that which is one. In other words, to not know what and where you are is to welcome non-duality.

When the fictional video is finished, you play it over and over again, until you are satisfied with the way you perceive your appearance. When this is accomplished you forget all about streaming, and that there ever was a video. As a matter of fact, there never was. The video and the universe it seems to reflect is make-believe.

The world of duality is a deception – just like Santa Claus
There is no reason to insist, that some appearances in a world of duality are wrong. Appearances can only be wrong if they exist – and they do not. Hence there is no reason to convince anybody, that the world is an illusion.

The belief in a world of duality is as harmless as the belief in Santa Claus. Sooner or later everybody realises, that it is not possible for an old man to fly in the sky on a sleigh driven by reindeer´s and that he is also too fat to crawl down the chimney with lots of presents. Just like it is not possible to appear as someone definitive in a world of duality.

_IGP7967-Edit-Edit

When playing a game you are free to act in any way you feel like. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

The only thing to learn from believing in the illusion of Santa Claus is, that he is not real. There is no reason, however, not to enjoy the excitement of the belief, while it lasts. Likewise, there is no reason not to enjoy the fantasy of duality, even though it is a deception as non-duality is the formlessness of that which is one, and formlessness is endless, so there is nothing else than non-duality.

To undo the belief in a world of duality
If you think there is something in a world of duality that can hurt you, you are making it real. But when you know such a the world is a deception, you smile at the silly idea, that something can upset you, and so you are free to act upon it in any way you fancy.

Just like in a video game you are free to act and kill all your enemies if that is your part to play. It can be quite fun indeed when know it is not real. This is, however, not a recommendation to kill anybody in physical life. But to allow yourself having fun to imagine it.

There are of course lots of other parts, you can play. You can, for example, respond with love and compassion, cry in desperation or whatever do what intuitively pops up in the same way you automatically respond by returning a ball, when somebody throws one towards you.

To conclude: As long as you appear to be someone in a world of duality give it your best shot. Do not leave anything undone. If anything is skipped, chances are you want to keep on playing the game until you get it right. When everything is done, you are undone as someone in a world of duality.

You are using the senses to fool yourself into believing, that you are someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one, so that it appears, as if it is possible to be and have more than that which is one. The image is grabbed from the web.

You are using the senses to be deceived into believing, you are someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one so that it appears as if there is more than that which is one. The image is grabbed from the web.

APPENDIX:
You cannot prove an illusion is real. That is why neither scientist, philosophers or those believing in the idea of an almighty God have not been able to explain the creation of the universe. Neither can you prove the universe is unreal because nothing unreal can be seen from that which is real. Well, nothing at all can be seen, as reality is that which is one and it takes more than one to see something. Whatever you prove is wrong, as it takes more than one to prove anything


NOTE: This article is part of hack #1.3 Pretending to be someone definitive is liberation.

Life is neither a cause or an effect, there is no karma!

If the car in this image makes you feel in a specific way, you are constructing an effect yourself. The image has no power to create any effect at all.

If the car in this image seems to make you feel in a specific way you are constructing this effect yourself. The image has no power to cause you to feel anything at all. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

You do not reap as you sow, and you do not get presents from Santa Claus, unless you are superstitious.

Karma promotes the idea, that physical, mental or emotional respond is an effect caused by an action in the past. But when you for example hammer a nail into the wall, you get an immediate physical effect of the nail moving into the wall. And this is not an effect of something you did in the past or in a so-called former life, but of something you do right now, so if you see a connection to the past it is a fabrication of your own.

If you hit your finger while hammering on the nail and remember you once hit somebody else, there is no cause and effect in play except. unless you invent it. Hitting the finger is just an accident. Nothing in your past caused it, norr is there anything set in motion for the future, apart from going to the doctor if the finger was hit very hard.

Karma is a construction of yours
The above conclusion is disappointing if you want causal connections to imply, your appearance as someone specific has a special meaning. However, as that which is you is the formlessness of that which is one, it is completely meaningless to appear as if you are someone definitive in a world defined by time and space, so such a connection have to be fabricated.

To suffer from bodily pain just because you accidentally hit your finger does not make you appear to be someone interesting, but by making a connection to for example your father, as if the pain relates to the sadness you seemed to cause him in your childhood, you have a basis for a story of cause and effect, where you and your father are part of something greater, so that you appear to be someone special with a higher purpose.

On top of that, such an invention of cause and effect makes it possible to justify any thought, emotion or action as ´caused´ by something greater, so that destiny can be used to justify everything you think, feel and do. In this way, you appear as innocent and something as guilty. Yet it never works as intended, because having excluded something from yourself by projecting it on something that is judged to be outside of you will not feel innocent but guilty.

If you feel upset and you justify it with what you perceive somebody else to have done or not done, you will feel instant guilt and probably also fear, as you will be afraid of the retaliation you expect from those you have judged to cause you feeling upset.

The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Every time you look for something, that seems to be able to justify your current state, you fabricate cause and effect – also called karma. As it is all an imagination, you feel the effect of it in the very same moment you imagine this connection. There is no other karma than this imagined connection of cause and effect. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Your construction of karma has no effect in the future but now
Every time you look for something that seems to justify your current state, it will appear to be caused by that and therefore to be an effect of it. Hence your state of mind feels real right now. So this fabrication of cause and effect is not something you will feel in the future but in the same moment, you exclude feelings from yourself by justifying them as caused by something judged to be separated from you.

Most want to believe the idea of karma, because if they are caused by something, the conclusion seems to be they exist.

But if you do not construct this connection, there is no cause. And as an effect cannot exist without a cause and vice versa, there is no specific state of mind. In other words, if you do not justify what you seem to think or feel it has no effect and so karma falls apart.

As the oneness of life is formless, it is without beginning and end and therefore everything. Hence nothing else could have caused it, neither can it cause anything else. In other words, whatever appears as if it is ruled by cause and effect is lifeless.

The concept of karma seems to prove, that a world where there seems to be more than one is real. But this proof is just as silly as when a little child believes Santa Claus is the cause of presents and based on this assumption of cause and effect concludes that Santa is real.


NOTES: 

If you are looking for the truth, you have come to the wrong place

Your appearance as someone definitive is not more real than a doll appearing to be someone specific. The experience of life inside you or a toy is make-believe. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

PART 1:
There is no truth in a world where there seems to be more than one, neither is there a higher truth beyond it, or in Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings. The conclusion, therefore, may be to stop looking for truth and accept the moment as it is. Yet there is not something to conclude because that requires more than one, and there is no more than that which is one since it is formless and therefore endless.

That which is real is the formlessness of oneness – and as formlessness is endless, it is everything. Hence you are not someone in a world where there seems to be more than one unless you believe, that it is possible to be and have more than everything.

As that which is you is no different from that which is one and as it takes more than one to understand something, the above has not been recognized. Nor has it been read, if not pretending to be someone in a world where there seems to be more than one – just like within the context of such a world one can pretend to be someone in the virtual world of a game.

Pretending to be someone in a game, you do not look for your true self, freedom, wellness or anything else in its world, because you know you are not there. Instead, you have fun pretending to be someone in a virtual world.

When you see there is no help to get in finding to that which is one, you are free from the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one. Be aware that this, like most of Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings, is to be perceived in the context of that which is one. In a world where there seems to be more than one, there may indeed be cases where help is needed. Photo © Alexius Jorgensen.

But if you perceive the world to be real and you actually are there, you must continuously look for somebody or something perceived to be different from you and thus attest to you being someone definitive. Hence the fun is replaced by the hard work of making nothing approve of something. See the article Help, I Need Somebody.

If you search for that kind of acknowledgement, you have come to the wrong place, because Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings are about undoing the belief, it is possible to be someone at all.

Just like Santa Claus is make-believe, so is what you appear to be. No transformation or transcendence will expose what this belief seems to hide. But when it is undone, it does not appear to hide that which is real.

Only what is not real can be found or realised.

This does not mean reality will be revealed because it is that which is one and it takes more than one to disclose something.

So be happy, if you sense the nothingness of what you believe to be but do not know that which is real, because assuming that you do will not set you free. Instead, it will imprison you in the belief that it is possible to be and have more than that which is one since it takes more than one to know anything.

My non teaching are not based on special experiences of parallel worlds, UFOs, astral worlds and what not, but on that which cannot be experienced, namely the enlightenment of that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

Alexius Enlightened Non-Teachings are not based on special experiences of parallel worlds, UFOs, astral worlds and what not, but on that which cannot be experienced, namely the enlightenment of that which is one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 2:
Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings
are not based on an extraordinary experience he once had and feel he must tell the whole world about. It is based on the enlightenment of that which is one*, which he cannot tell anybody about it, because it is not an experience, neither a state of mind. It is not of a world where there seems to be more than one but of that which is one – and as sharing requires more than one, it is impossible to share it.

A world where there seems to be more than one – also called the world of duality – can be experienced, but not only in the standard accepted way. I have had many experiences of parallel worlds – some similar to planet Earth but others quite different and not so opaque looking. These worlds can be experienced from anywhere in a world of duality – just like all channels in a TV can be experienced from anywhere in such a world, as long as you turn on a TV.

Alexius has seen universes been born in slow motion, gods in castles made of clouds, the face of Jesus, several versions of the island I am living on and much more. He has not seen UFOs and does not know if they are there or not. But it makes no difference, as UFOs, gods in cloud-like castles or other exotic visions are all something experienced, and any experience – including those via meditation or prayer – is an illusion made in the brain.

In other words, all experiences are part of the world of duality, no matter how sacred the experience seems to be. The only experience that is not part of duality is the enlightenment of that which is one.* Well, it cannot be experienced at all, as that requires more than one.

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings uses the world of duality to point to the enlightenment of that which is one as a door to oneness. It is, of course, a metaphor, because that which is one has no entry, as it is formless and therefore has no inside or outside. Besides what is formless is endless, so it is not possible to leave it.

As to be something requires more than one, the ego likes to help you become a so-called spiritual person or whatever you believe will make you special, because in this way you help the ego extending its own life.

Unfortunately, the uncritical admiration of those who have had experiences of being near-death and out-of-body or seen godlike beings, UFOs, Jesus and whatnot make it easy for the rogue consciousness of the self to keep you busy searching for something to make you special instead of settling for the happiness of being a basic self. Read more about that in hack #4.2 The basic self versus the special one.

Thus Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings are not based upon Alexius – or anybody else’s – experience, but on that which cannot be experienced and therefore neither shared. Consequently, they are nothing but pointers to what is not one. Following them, you feel happy to slowly but surely have the belief in being someone undone.

Be happy if you do not get it, because there is nothing to get unless you want to enhance the belief in a world, where there seems to be more than one. The graphic is grabbed from the web.


Be grateful if you are not getting it, because there is nothing to get except frustration, as it is only if you believe to be someone definitive in a world where there seems to be more than one, that it seems possible to get something, and there is no such world, since that which is one is formless and therefore endless. The belief that you are someone definitive is, therefore, the cause of all confusion. The graphic is grabbed from the web.

PART 3:
If you try to understand Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings you will fail, because, in order to understand them, they need to have a beginning and end, that leads to a conclusion deducted from their coherent arguments.

That which is one can never be understood in a world where there seems to be more than one.

But Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings is not written with a beginning and end, neither do they try to be coherent. Least of all do they have a conclusion, except that everything experienced is an illusion, but as that includes the conclusion as well, there is none. 

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings have no answers, as that would imply there is someone to ask questions and another one to answer them, which is not possible, since that which is one is formless and therefore endless, so there is no more than that which is one.

Fortunately, the truth needs not to be argued for. Neither is it possible, because it is that which is one, and it takes more than one to prove something. As it also requires more than one to understand something,** it cannot be understood.

Nothing needs to be done or avoided, because what and where you believe to be, does not exist since it takes more than one to exist and there is no more than that which is one because it is formless and therefore endless. The animation is grabbed from the web.

This does not mean though that understanding – or anything else – should be avoided, as that requires more than one as well.

If you wish to be somewhere else, you cannot be in the formlessness of that which is one, as it is not somewhere but everywhere, because it is formless and therefore endless.

For the same reason, there is nothing you can do to return to that which is one. Besides, doing something defines you to as the one doing it, and being someone is only possible if you believe to be in a world where there seems to be more than one, which depends on the denial of that which is one.

Alexius´ Enlightened Non-Teachings cannot be used to get a better life, because there is no other life than that which is one. Yet they can be used to grasp, that this is so.

Yet there is something you can do, because by applying one or more of the duality hacks you become indifferent to the apparent differences in a world where there seems to be more than one, and thus to you being someone there, wherefore there is nobody doing anything.


*) Though you cannot learn how to be enlightened, there are more about the enlightenment of that which is one in hack #5-7.

**) The article is written within the context of the assumption, that you want to have the belief in a world where there seems to be more than one undone. If not, there is much to understand, as it is hard work to learn how to consciously experience a world where there seems to be more than one to be real.


NOTE: This is article is part of hack #1.1 The world is make-believe.